The contents of the article must be consumed in order to discuss them intelligently, to create an informed opinion, and to pose questions that have positive worth within the conversation that ensues from its having been read and ruminated upon?
Preposterous notion.
Are you replying to/commenting on the OP's title? Did you not read past its first sentence, into its second, mentioning the plane?
Fair rebuttal; we're meant to infer the left-side hand pointing at the watch belongs to the same model of the right-side arm that's wearing the watch. Admittedly, this is an assumption based on insufficient data. It's not impossible that the finger-pointing left hand and the watch-wearing right wrist are owned by two different models.
That doesn't change the fact that the watch is worn on a right-arm wrist in an orientation that would show it as upside down to a right-arm wrist owner.
The 3 McDonald's menu items' calorie values displayed add up to the sum displayed; where is there a discrepancy of 100?
How is McDonald's wrong? A few of the others are, but where is the error on that one?
Struggling to spell, read, or write can all be signs of dyslexia...
This answered nothing… Could you explicitly state what a mouth has to do with dyslexia?
The irony. :-|
Placement of the shark's eyes makes me question Larson's qualifications as a marine biologist.
I was thinking the same thing. This is a fine example of the exception to the rule that you should not place the horizon in the middle of the frame.
...our word “diamond” comes from adamant…
As does our word, "adamant". 🙂
I hope you have named these forks after Muppets.
From left to right, they are clear to me as: Robin the Frog, Kermit, Bunsen Honeydew, and Beaker.
