Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IA
Posts
33
Comments
518
Joined
10 mo. ago

  • My point was the indecency of prosecution without explanation.

    It's impractical too, to boot somebody without telling them why, as somebody else in this thread pointed out.

    Another person in this thread suggested that such discussions are wasted effort. That such discussion, and the healthy society it engenders, is not the aim of those in control. (Ie the mods' bosses). That they simply want max control for min cost.

  • (Does anybody actually read the post anymore?)

    I addressed the act of prosecution without explanation. To remove a post without telling the person why they removed it. To tell them what rule was broken, or spirit contradicted, or even views offended. Anything!

    But to just remove a post without conversation. That's just crappy. And everybody agrees that it's damn crappy. But it's considered normal now. Which is crazy.

    That's what I want to discuss.

  • So it's just efficient? Ok.

    Explaining your actions may be the right (prosocial?) thing to do but right is not the point. Control is the point.

    And 99% of the people here never say anything deviant enough to get censored over anyway. So what's a few edge cases.

    That's kinda cynical, which I can appreciate.