We didn't have to poop back then. The act of pooping was invented by Larry Smartphone, who also happened to invent the smartphone. They were released together originally as a bundle but everyone has both nowadays anyways and you can mix and match.
Is this Russian psyop? What warrants that fear of yours? I suppose I'm as scared of that as I am getting bit by a shark in Idaho - it's technically possible but extremely unlikely.
They certainly are in that less logical camp, that's for sure. And you're right, they have not and will not learn anything from this instance, or similar ones, going forward.
Got my ban overturned :)
For the troll in here, idk your name I blocked you, the guy "very fluent" in these matters - take this opportunity to humble and educate yourself
I can't tell you why, you are entirely correct. The EAC runtime used in Linux doesn't have any kernel access, I misunderstood the context of the conversation when I made my first comment.
I might take you up on that, thanks for the offer!
Got any recommended sources for someone looking to do the same thing? My home server is approaching 18 years old, was looking to set up something neat and tidy to replace it when it eventually fails. Tricking a windows vm sounds pretty useful too!
How exactly does one prove a negative? Juggling fallacies isn't a good look, my friend.
Are you aware that EAC is indeed a kernel level anticheat? Apex 100% does not use a user space anticheat, it is kernel level.
You're the goat! Thanks for sharing. I dropped a comment to the respawn employee and a comment on the EA thread linked in the reddit post.
I mean she did tell you to kick rocks, in so many words. No one wants to be friends with or even interact with someone they consider to be a stalker, let alone their stalker. She called you a stalker which implies she doesn't want to be around you without saying so, many times people will avoid being so blunt about stuff like that for fear of retaliation. She was hoping you'd pick up on the hint that she doesn't want to be friends without having to confront you about it directly.
I'm not passing any judgement, I think you were right it was a bit of a miscommunication on both ends; she wasn't entirely clear and you missed the implications of her message.
I don't understand why the five year old would have any charges against it in that scenario, they too were a victim. From the moment they were tossed, any forthcoming damages and assaults are placed on the person chucking said child.
Easy one, next question I like these.
Another neat trick: X% of Y is equal to Y% of X. That is, in your example, 27% of 65 == 65% of 27. So check and see which combination might provide fewer steps/messy numbers.
13.5 (50% of 27) + 2.7 (10% of 27) + 1.35 (5% of 27) = 17.55
So are ya gonna let us know what the site is? Maybe I missed it in the thread somewhere...
Next time I get a bad ulcer I'll remember this advice and just power through it, you're a genius