Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FR
Posts
8
Comments
6,912
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Have to drop the US number by 20% for continuous loads like a kettle would be.

    That said, US homes built in the last 40 years or so tend to have a lot of separate circuits in the kitchen. My house has one for the fridge, one for the disposal, one for the dishwasher, one for the lights that's shared with lights in adjacent areas, stove has its own 240V outlet, and then one for all the other plugs. If I ran the microwave and a kettle and a mixer all at once, I'd probably still trip it, but that's a lot of multitasking going on.

  • Microwave magnetron efficiency is around 65%. Since a kettle turns electricity directly into heat, it's basically 100% efficient.

    A caveat is that microwaves will heat water directly and won't lose as much to its surroundings. This is similar to why induction stoves are more efficient; they're less efficient on paper than direct electric heating or burning gas, but they heat the thing you want in a more direct way.

    Even so, a microwave isn't great for this task. If you're short on space and don't want even a small travel kettle, I can see why you'd take this option. Otherwise, no.

  • Most residential outlets in the US are going to be a 15A limit. You also have to reduce that by 20% for a continuous draw.

    UK might be able to get away with the full usage because their plugs are designed to have a fuse built in. Not entirely sure on that, though.

    That said, kettles are still a better option most of the time. Technology Connections has real world tests of this.

  • We have a Zojirushi. 120V does limit it somewhat, but it's fine.

    The water in our area of country is also hard as shit. We have undersink RO now, but before then, mineral buildup in the kettle was bad. Crusted like concrete if we didn't stay on top of it.

  • If I had a suppressor on my AR-15, I'd still be using hearing protection. I really should be doubling up on ear plugs and muffs together, but I tend to have a lot of earwax buildup, and properly inserted ear plugs tend to compact that problem.

    Subsonic 5.56NATO is a joke.

  • Right now, the market for them is distorted by the tax stamp. Only a few people bother with the paperwork and fee (even though it's been highly streamlined in recent years). That means companies producing them have to make up their costs with high prices rather than volume. It's almost a stealth tax on top of the stated tax.

    That results in only a few well off people getting them. This has little overlap with skill or appreciation for the hobby.

    Drop them from the NFA, and now everyone with a 3D printer can just run one off. Even in traditional manufacturing, you have a much larger customer base, and the company can sell on volume rather than high prices.

  • Even that being true, it's readily apparent that Christians always choose which scriptures to highlight. The fundamentalist ones will say you must take the whole bible or nothing, but that's not how they behave. Not at all.

    Let's assume the homophobic translation of Romans 1 is the correct one. Is any given Christian talking about that, or are they talking about being kind to the poor, pointing out the hypocrisy of religious leaders, or that the literal, obvious interpretation of "rich men can't get through the eye of a needle" is the correct one? There's so many scriptures they could be highlighting, and it's conspicuous that they choose to make a homophobic one really, really important to them.

    MAGA Christians tend to get very angry if you point this out. The usual responses are along the lines of "you only know a few cherry picked scriptures as talking points" or "you atheists would burn alive if you actually read the bible".