earphone843 @ earphone843 @sh.itjust.works Posts 2Comments 1,036Joined 2 mo. ago
It's definitely on the justice department for not executing a seditious traitor.
Also, Biden could have just shot Trump in the face and suffered no legal consequences.
By having oligarchs embezzle all of the money for it.
Yeah, he could be an advisor to a younger progressive or something.
You mean singular circle?
Not necessarily. Watching a bunch of Alone, you'd be surprised at how few calories small animals have. Pomeranians don't exactly have a lot of meat on their bones.
He can't pardon state convictions.
The legal benefits are provided by the marriage contract. The papers you sign at the courthouse to declare you're legally married are the contract.
I'm sorry, but do you actually think the bureau of prisons cares? They're probably excited about trans women getting murdered.
This isn't an issue where calling anyone is going to have any change. The cruelty is the point.
Dietary cholesterol actually has little to do with blood cholesterol levels. It's almost all genetics.
Just stimulants. The DEA won't let drug manufacturers purchase enough ingredients to meet demand (which skyrocketed during covid).
What the actual fuck are you talking about? The rights I mentioned aren't possible just because a priest says so. The contract is what makes them possible.
Hell, just a map of Texas
Not really. Not buying things for one day isn't going to have any impact on anything.
Having a strike or boycott with an end date is completely pointless.
Idk, maybe voting against the dude who straight up said he would be a dictator and you'd never vote again?
My analogy is that it was like someone threw a molotov cocktail through your window, but you let the house burn down because the window didn't stop the bottle.
And dairy cows are shot up with antibiotics and hormones. Gotta pick your poison.
Nah, he has dirt on them. The DNC emails weren't the only ones hacked, but they were the only ones released.
Yeah, colors are just whatever the simulation decided it should be
Marriage is a contract, not a religious ceremony. Being married carries a ton of legal benefits and rights that most people aren't even aware of.
There's a reason you have to see a judge and not a priest to get divorced.
You really think the rules will apply to the ruling class?