comfy @ comfy @lemmy.ml

Posts

53

Comments

1,200

Joined

3 yr. ago

Moderating

---

I don’t care much about the OS people use

On a surface level, same. On the other hand, I do believe that more users, if combined with certain design and documentation choices, can enable more contributions and fixes and software support, and I believe this has already been a huge factor in recent improvements to the Linux experience like Proton.

Can’t possibly be more vulnerable than Windows

The linked article provides many examples where security techniques lag far behind Windows. Vulnerability isn't as simple as being 'more vulnerable' or 'less vulnerable', it's a complex concept, and both GNU/Linux and Windows have design decisions which make each better than the other in various ways. We need to understand security in a more nuanced way than "x is better than y" if we actually want to protect ourselves from threats.

A Linux installation can be set to run root with no password or prompt. A Linux user can choose to never update their software - one could argue that Windows forced OS updates are an improvement here. The argument that the typical user has more technical understanding is a weak defense (as in, we really really really should not rely on that) and also irrelevant when we're talking about Linux gaining a wider audience.

Yeah, unfortunate to rain in the parade but GNU/Linux definitely needs some attention sooner rather than later. Plenty of design benefits, but also plenty of pitfalls from an OS sec POV.

Average users aren't installing SELinux or Qubes so I hope no-one was actually going to reply with what Linux can do as opposed to the everyday user experience.

A few years outdated, but relevant: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux.html

Much better than I'd expected, that's great to hear! The minor bugs are always annoying, but like you mentioned, the speed boost hopefully outweighs it.

IIRC Drew Pavlou is in circles with literal self-declared open neo-Nazis. Like someone said, pure attention grift.

I'd say it's because it's not a default on the most popular operating systems (Windows, MacOS, Android systems, iOS).

How would a typical user discover Firefox?

Thanks for linking Madaidan's guide, been a while since I checked those.

Definitely update us on UE, I've haven't explored the EU or Unity on Linux, and it would be nice to know if they work, because "you can use Godot" doesn't work for everyone.

Except for one, where suspend instantly wakes up the pc and is therefore unusable. But i will figure that out another day.

Is this just an automatic suspend after inactivity? Because if so, I think it the inactivity timeout can be disabled in the settings menu, as a workaround until you can figure it out.

I'm not sure what you mean by "believing in" comeuppance. It doesn't automatically happen when people do bad things, it's not a real material thing. People can do harmful things that sometimes cause people to react and punish them, and I'd say that fits your definition of comeuppance, but it's not some guaranteed or spiritual concept. So I can't say I believe in comeuppance, even when it happens.

If you mean in a sense of justice, I don't really advocate punitive justice, as gratifying as it is. What comeuppance does someone truly atrocious on a mass scale deserve? There's a point where you'd need to artificially prolong someone's life for thousands of years of torture just to scrape the surface of the suffering they've caused to humanity (let alone other creatures), some proper "I Have No Mouth" sci-fi stuff would be the necessary fate to qualify as Hitler's comeuppance. And what does it accomplish? Not much. In the end, just give them a bullet as quickly as possible to prevent them hurting more people, we can leave ironic fates to the novelists.

COBOL

Well, I was surprised at the time...

The Democratic Party is an Iranian insurgency.

Fragging- whoops wrong link, Fragging is an established tradition among invading forces, and one the IDF soldiers would be smart to learn if they want to avoid this suicidal PTSD from perpetrating crimes against humanity on innocent citizens.

I actually tried flatpak uninstall --unused and it didn't remove these ones. So there's something odd going on there. My guess is maybe Mint manually installed them through the driver manager program? That's a wild guess, I don't know how it works.

I almost wonder if there's a PR team making them, trying to impersonate Trump's style.

If I had no idea who he was, I could give extreme benefit of the doubt and say it's spin. Claiming a loss is really a win.

But we do know who he is, so I'm going with imbecility.

I agree, it's very tactless.

Mint took a while to handle flatpak decently in the update manager, and now it's a nice experience.

Plus I found on my install flatpak wasn't cleaning up the flatpaks autoinstalled for older versions of nvidia drivers, they were all still listed as dependencies. Not sure who's to blame but that was taking up a few much needed GBs.

Where is that constraint coming from? "Death to [x]" is a statement of a desire.

"Death to Americans" would be a call for the deaths of citizens. Obviously Iran doesn't consider the typical American citizen to be oppressing them, so they are not interested in calling for that.

Someone yelling "death to America" could still be supporting the death of George W. Bush or Donald Trump, who are Americans. It could even involve combating many in the US military. That's still very different from calling for "death to Americans", because the target is the regime, not its citizens simply for being citizens.

But I still think you've raised an interesting discussion to have so I've tried to answer it.

In an ideal world, regime change. Relatively peaceful dissolution is preferable and possible (consider the death of the Soviet Union).

However, given the ruthlessness of the people with the most power in the US, I suspect they would gladly kill millions of Americans before even considering a peaceful surrender. People are shot by the state in regular protests, let alone one directly threatening the state (case in point - Jan 6 had a protester killed by police). So unless some interesting lucky opportunities open up (such as a military coup), the USA will (continue to) kill Americans to maintain stability, regardless of whether those opposing the USA kill a single American.

Given that situation, it sounds like any resistance to the US is bad because will likely involve deaths of innocent people. Yes, but the other side of the story is that to do nothing ''also'' results in the deaths of innocent people. To the people running the show, it's completely normal to oversee the constant atrocious social murder of many thousands each year through poverty, artificial scarcity of food and medication, healthcare denial and other neglect in the name of profit. We overproduce enough food to feed everyone, there's enough land and property to house everyone.

To do nothing is to allow many Americans to keep dying each day from easily preventable deaths. To fix that system will most likely kill many Americans in the process. You can almost simplify it down to a trolley problem - there's no clean solution whichever choice you make. But, for each of us, there is a correct decision.

Definitely. On one hand, I don't enjoy celebrating war deaths at all, especially with all the generalizations and complexities at play, but on the other hand, those are active soldiers in an invading army and the bottom line is that their deaths means Gazan lives saved and less power for the genocide project. It is reassuring to know that the resistance is still having victories.