For most of the code, I don't think anything special is used.
Compiling the code already obfuscates it enough. Most function, type and variable names are removed, the compiler does some optimizations and what you end up with is already pretty indecipherable code soup.
There are obfuscators that make the resulting binaries even harder to read/decompile, but further obfuscation also makes your code run slower.
If you have vitamin deficiencies, fortified food can also cause you to run at 120%. In some countries (e.g. US) Noodles and flour are fortified with B-vitamins. Maybe that's what you're experiencing?
It happened to me a few times.
player_hand and dealer_hand are only [DECK_SIZE/2] in length, but in initialize_decks you write zeros into them unti [DECK_SIZE -1].
Since the arrays are located next to each other in memory you end up overwriting the deck array.
I think it makes more sense if you think about backend applications: If you write a Webserver with ExpressJS in typescript, you need typescript only to compile it (dev dependency) but once compiled, you only need ExpressJS in your node_modules for the app to be able to run ("regular" dependency).
Frontend development is a bit strange in that respect, because often everything gets bundled into your dist/ directory, so technically there are no runtime dependencies? In that case it's more of a hint to let you know "this goes into the bundle" vs. "this is part of the compiler toolchain"
The title is essentially click bait, absolutely nothing changed. Random comments from a NATO secretary general don't change international law or contracts. They still can't use any of the weapons provided by other countries on Russian territory, because it was part of the deal(s) they were provided under.
Considering MRTs use 1.5-7 Tesla, I can't imagine microtesla will be doing anything, unless you have a piece of metal in your head.
Maybe it's an ear infection or a migraine or something like that gets worse from the cup pressure. If it's a problem, ask a doctor.
If it's his responsibility to do the dishes, you cannot do them for him.
I need a couple of weeks to get used to new responsibilities in the household. You gave your husband a solid 12 hours.
He probably feels like you didn't even give him a proper chance, hence his response. He probably wasn't trying to be manipulative.
It's going to be really frustrating for you, but IMO the only way to solve this, will be to not touch the dishes for a couple of weeks.
The probability of getting a finite number is pretty much zero.
For any range [0; n], where n is finite, there are always infinitely many numbers larger than n, so the probability of getting a number in said range is n/(n+infinity).
I feel very confident in saying that something with that probability will never happen.
It better be Greenland or I'll be disappointed