Yondoza @ Yondoza @sh.itjust.works

Posts

10

Comments

403

Joined

2 yr. ago

Thank you for the write up. That distinction makes a lot of sense.

Ahh fantastic point. There isn't really an incentive for the individuals to maintain/perpetuate the institution.

I understand the sentiment. I'm wondering about the efficacy of the strategies to achieve those end goals.

I don't agree with this. Shareholders extracting value from a company is arguably more of an 'inefficency' than treating employees fairly. Well treated employees provide a benefit to the company while shareholders purely remove resources.

I have no data to back up my claim, just logic, so I could very well be wrong.

Uncanny resemblance to Eddy from the Lion King.

Congratulations (if this isn't a joke)!!! I'd love to help make the world habitable for your child.

It's a bird, so that's prob the he.

That you very much for writing this up. It is super interesting, and I feel bad for dismissing her. Unfortunately, I will probably continue people whom are the vague they.

I disagree. Minimum wage is minimum wage. If you don't care about the moral implications of the for profit prison system... Paying equal wages for prisoners will force higher wages in the non captive population.

You have my attention...

Anyone have a War Thunder Forum vs Hegseth leaked classified information chart going? War Thunder had a few years head start, but Hegseth seems really committed to overtaking.

Also fucked by JP Morgan if memory serves.

Instead of POC, I think the closest equivalent to a modern circumstance would probably be part of a repressed majority, like apartheid South Africa or British India.

He was obviously a POC, but it wouldn't have the same social implications it does today. He did live in a Roman province where locals had inferior rights to Roman citizens. I think it's a more historically accurate (but probably less useful) parallel for this post.

I read this in Jake Peralta's voice.

Difficulty of reform aside, the pain and suffering that will come from societal collapse will be immense. The chance of successfully building a better system out of the crumbled remains is low. I don't think it's a great aspiration.

A plague of plagues is a plague?

That's an unpopular opinion??

The administration is completely different. The GOP had a lot more influence on the admin choices in 2016. MAGA is the party now and they get to appoint anyone they want. 2016 still had people who believed in democracy, the 2024 administration sees it as a hinderance.

What the fuck is this headline? The main subject of the reporting is the online reaction to the actual news story. Why can't they just report the event and not people's reaction to it?

1 fascist beating ~= 10 citations.

Get to it, bud!