Unitedestadian has long been the term used to describe USA citizens by the Spanish-speaking population of the Americas. Not their fault the country picked a length intro title and a vague region as their country name. Imagine if the UK was the UKE, United Kingdom of Europe, and called themselves Europeans by default. The other 90% would be pissed and make their own names, no?
They said face shields first, masks second. I'd guess they just wanted to avoid repetition and chose a not so accurate word. Somewhere between medical and riot face shields are $10 harbor freight grinder/spark shields. They're not going to stop a rubber bullet, but you might just keep your eye. If any small explosives get involved, it'd shield your face from debris. But it could be more Ike a mask to shield your face from cameras
"head into town and get supplies from the warehouse"
meanders into town
Shit, alright, uh, the quest was... Talk to... I don't know, are there any cats around? I guess I'll ask the Wanderer their life story. Maybe they'll have a clue for me.
Like the Aztek, I bet it'll normalize and seem less obnoxious in a few years as the cars become more commonplace and other manufacturers follow the trend.
Yeah, it felt disingenuous as I built out my sample list when I realized my knowledge of supercars drops off around 2010. New corolla, old corolla, let the reader be the judge. Gonna go back and add some camrys.
I suppose I could have also included weights.
25 corolla is around 3000lbs, 2000 around 2400.
05 Murcie is 3600 while a 2018 Huracan is 3100.
Chiron is 4400, veyron is 4200
F40 is 2400, F50 is 2700
Ferr 360 is 3000, while 296 gtb 3200
Lincoln LS. Jaguar S-type chassis under a Lincoln-badged homework-copied E39 body. Not an M5 clone, more like a 540 knockoff. It wasn't far off when it was introduced in 2000, but it didn't improve nearly as much as it needed to over its 7 year run to stay competitive. At all. Common sedans were getting comparable in acceleration and luxury was an American translation of a base 3 series, but at least it has a sweet double wishbone suspension front and back. There's a dozen stylistic differences over the model years and trims you won't see because it's not your car and you don't look at it every day
I also don't care about the hofmeister kink. It's here or there. I like the little kick up you can see on the LS or 2010-2014 Mustang. It existed before Hofmeister did it to a BMW and is more of a BMW bro thing to mention than an absolute success in design. Audi doesn't usually do it, looks just as mean.
Supercars are quite small. They have very low roofs and are often quite wide, so your sense of scale is thrown off.
2025 corolla: 182"L x 70"W x 56"H
2000 corolla: 174" x 67" x 55"
2025 camry: 194 x 72 x 57
2000 camry: 189 x 70 x 55
2004 murcielago: 180" x 80" x 44"
2006 gallardo: 169 x 75 x 46
2018 huracan: 176 x 76 x 46
2024 296 gtb: 180 x 77 x 47
2016 chiron: 179 x 80 x 47
1987 F40: 172 x 78 x 44
1995 F50: 176 x 78 x 44
Even the veyron, a sweaty potato on wheels: 176 x 79 x 47
Totally agree on the perception point. BMW looks nice because it looks like a BMW which is nice. They've carried a fairly consistent design language from year to year. Design overhaul in these brands are somewhat rare, but they'll carry it across the lineup. Look at Jaguar when they phased from 80s drug lord to whatever the XF look is called. (edit: Ian Callum designs?)
The only thing I could say specifically to OP's observation is it sounds like they're always picking out the brands with squared bodies and condescending headlights. Mercedes might be pushing it with their jewel eyes, but there's still a consistent air of importance around the bodies (please don't mention the CLA). No nonsense, no happy eyes, defined body lines, chrome blended flat into the panels, stout wheels, and sportier rooflines (please don't mention the 5 series GT).
Taste is subjective. I'm not a fan of how they rounded these out in this generation. I like them more when dressed up with sporty bits to add hard angles into this bloated design. But at least it's not a Bengal 7? Still has his touch. Peak design was E39 for me. So much so, I own it's American copycat that's twice as reliable as an M5. But I'll stick with the other person's opinion: needlessly pretentious. You can describe all the lines that make it beautiful to you without being bringing such condescending tone about art degrees or classic BMW snobbery about a single car design being literally genius. You think it's beautiful because you own it. It's not the BMW I'd pick. But sure, yours looks better to me than whatever melted wax model they delivered in the latest design era.
Alright, I think I can see I was picturing data in the wrong dimension. The data for an AM radio, in a very human-like interpretation, is running along the time axis rather than actual width across the available sources. It'd take multiple radios to "see" multiple frequencies.
Truck exhaust blows away. They can't see it anymore. Contrails linger for a while. They can see that.
They can see planes. They can't see inside planes. Therefore, they can imagine anything they want inside because they can't verify it themselves.
The things they can't see anymore are gone. The things they can't see into contain the worst possible scenario.
And that litter box in schools things for the kid identifying as a cat? The story is ALWAYS about someone else's schools. They can picture a different school. They can imagine the worst scenario in there.
This whole political ideology is an exercise in failed object permanence.
This is, unfortunately, the same observation I've made in all the chemtrail-beleiving people I know. I zig in discussion, they zag, I realize they're taking small-scale cloud seeding operations as proof of both contrails being chemtrails and, often enough, humans fueling hurricanes for the leftist agenda. These people also tend to deny human ability to affect the planet's climate. The underlying logical interpretation of these states' bills is exactly why they're upheld, meanwhile, their constituents are still thinking about contrails.
I can't tell you which to do. The comments so far seem pretty adamant in saying don't bring it up. So what I can offer is my experience for having done exactly what you think you want to do. Unfortunately, I don't have any real feedback from the other side.
I had a girlfriend for most of high school. Things weren't great, but I didn't know better. We broke up abruptly somewhat shortly after graduation and I was an asshole without remorse. Both of us dated quickly and ended up marrying our next dates (though several years down the line). A few years after the breakup, I started feeling deeply upset about it probably monthly. I had avoided all the high school group meetups because I felt she was entitled to those friends more. But at that point, I was alone and didn't have my own friends - just my girlfriend's. I feel this was part of an overall feeling of failure. Low paying job, untapped career path, living with my parents, college dropout, and alone. I still thought about the high school girlfriend often. Not in a luatful or coveting way, just in a caring way? Is she OK, does she hate me, did I cause long term pain, does her family hate me, etc.
So one day, probably 7 years after the breakup, I messaged her. I said I was sorry for the way I acted and for hurting her. I said I was glad she moved on. It felt long on a phone by FB messenger, but it was probably just 6 sentences.
She said none of what happened mattered. We were kids. We didn't know better and it wasn't a serious relationship anyway and that it wasn't a big deal. She then asked if I was OK. Twice. I think she thought I was at risk of harming myself. That was the end of the conversation.
I imagine appearing out of the blue and going straight to a painful period brought back some pain. It hurt me to hear her say years together weren't important. I can hypothesize she was lying a little bit, either now to downplay it to me or earlier to herself. I can hypothesize I put depressing thoughts of us into her head for a while. I don't know what effect I had on her from that moment.
But I stopped thinking about her.
I hate to promote causing your friend pain to release yourself, but I don't know how else to do it. I can guess that was a symptom of my overall mental health rather than the cause of my pain in that time period. So before you do this to free yourself, I ask, are you feeling OK otherwise? Are you dwelling on other mistakes? Are you content with your trajectory?
The point is we have adaptations that allow us to handle the amount of light we live in. As humans, it's not sensitive enough for moonless night activities and not adaptive enough to handle staring at the sun, but appropriate for most earthly activities. Meanwhile, nocturnal eyes in other animals are easily overwhelmed in daytime and diurnal eyes can be even less useful at night. So for this alien, we can't decide if it'll be blinded or perfectly competent at handling our local illumination. All depends on if it evolved to hide between stars or eat inner planets
Edit: the 2 comments below give a pretty good explanation as to why the following comment is not correct. Original comment, as always:
I don't see why they'd have to have big eyes. We use massive radio telescopes for sensitivity, not for the spectrum range. AM radio is in the order of 100 meter wavelengths, but handheld devices can receive it. Wavelength isn't really the defining factor as much as being able to handle the frequency of the data over the time required. Wavelength is not how tall the wave is, amplitude is.
Well yeah, JD is great. He did things like... Gang up on Zelensky, so he's got the general Maga crowd s vote and he killed the pope, so now he's got the entire non-catholic Christian vote. Pretty solid.
That coulda worked. If only it didn't sound like an Ace Combat antagonist country. Osea, Usea, Yuktobonia, Belka, Aurelia, Usonia, see?