WatDabney @ WatDabney @sopuli.xyz

Posts

8

Comments

922

Joined

2 yr. ago

Opposing genocide isn't an extremist position.

Defending genocide is in fact the extremist position. It's also a loathsome, vile and wholly evil position, fit only for psychopaths and disgusting pieces of shit.

Like, apparently, Michael Rapaport.

That's the sort of thing that happens when your president is a raving lunatic with the emotional maturity of a toddler.

Try electing a sane adult next time

If there is a next time...

Because the longer they go without being arrested, the greater their crimes are going to be. And it would be good to at least do it before they reach the mass murder stage.

Spinach

Oh gee - that'd sure be a shame... Uncreative idiot opportunists wouldn't be able to parasitize off of other people's creativity without at least paying them for it. Oh whatever will we do?

Despite the dramatic announcement, Green's effort lacks support from Democratic leadership. A senior House Democrat told Axios that Green's impeachment articles would go nowhere.

Democratic Representative Pete Aguilar echoed this sentiment, saying, "This isn't a focus of the Democratic Caucus."

So what exactly is a focus of the Democratic Caucus?

As near as I can tell, their focus is entirely on registering just barely enough tepid opposition to the plutocrats' agenda to avoid looking too much like blatant collaborationists and.... that's about it.

I'm sorry, but unless these groups are funneling millions of dollars of soft money into party coffers, their opinions don't matter to the DNC.

Anybody who wants to ethnically cleanse brown people in order to steal their land is Trump's kind of person.

Huh... I didn't expect Graham to regurgitate a position opposing Trump and Russia.

Somebody must've outbid the oligarchs....

To paraphrase the Narcissist's Prayer, he's currently moving from "That won't happen" to "And if it does, it won't be that bad" and on to "And if it is, that's not a big deal."

So expect "And if it is, that's not my fault" in the not terribly distant future.

However, claiming that boys are only seduced by misogyny because of class issues and the misuse of identity politics is manifestly inaccurate. (emphasis mine)

I've never seen anyone, including anyone this author cites, say that they "only" are.

And so on, and so on...

If my government the government that's managed to weasel its way into power over the land on which I happened to be born proposed an initiative to tackle fraud, I would look for the catch, because it's guaranteed there would be one.

So I'm curious - does your pretzel logic extend to other situations?

Imagine... John and Bob both want to buy a used car, and they both know that the other wants it too. Bob makes a better offer and gets to buy the car. Is John then justified to shoot him and take the car by force?

Or is that a right you reserve exclusively for Russia?

I love the irony of the fact that the tankie take on Ukraine is identical to the position generally taken by spouse abusers - "you shouldn't have made me attack you."

Clearly signaling who they actually represent.

Not that their supporters will notice though.

Connolly is an accomplice in the coup d'etat.

Well I assumed it was the crybaby hiding behind his mommy since it's his chatbot.

But now that I think about it, the manbaby in the leaky diaper is just as fragile, so it's possible that it all started with him boo-hooing to the crybaby.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other...

"Lefties keep calling us Nazis but they don't even know what Nazis are, and oh yeah, by the way, all of these people over here should be killed because they're an inferior race."

Even setting aside the staggering psychopathy of the modern right - their complete and utter disregard for the lives of other human beings - I don't even begin to understand how any human being could have so little self-awareness.

Such a fragile little manchild.