No, it isn't. I was using an example to explain my definition of China's firewall. It would have been whataboutism if I left the argument entirely solely to mention how the US is keeping Mexican immigrants in concentration camps.
Damn, America can't blame China this time. What to do?
Luckily unlike you and eight others, the mods here have common sense and can identify racism when they see it.
Freedom of expression is not freedom to be racist.
Noooo, don't do it pleeeease.
All countries will need to cross that bridge eventually, Brazil is more apt to this task than the USA for example.
How many Chinese websites did you visit today?
Eat poop, Trump.
EDIT: I want to clarify that I do not condone cannibalism.
We must always be grateful to the EU for saving us from American tech giants. It's such a shame that America is on such terribly low moral ground in these matters.
Nigeria plans to distribute grains and fertiliser from Monday and raise salaries of government workers,
They had us in the first half, not gonna lie.
Ignite hate?
I'm fighting AGAINST the ones spreading hate. Their posts were removed for being islamophobic.
You are dehumanizing innocent islamic civilians based on acts committed by their countries and predecessors.
How is this great firewall isolationist policy different from what other countries are doing with immigrants?
It's an isolationist policy, one that does not put Mexicans in concentration camps.
That's wrong too, one evil does not justify another.
We will probably agree that Islamophobia is ignorant and repulsive.
No, we must agree 100%, someone can't be half-racist or half-homophobic, they can't be half-islamophobic either. There are no half measures, we must respect all races, cultures, religions and world views.
You should find a psychiatrist if you're unable to cope with any of the above.
That's whataboutism, the article doesn't say anything about burning people. It's the Christians who were burning people during the inquisition times if you want to go there.
I have been reporting your comments and they have been deleted en masse, because I'm right in this discussion and you're just Islamophobic.
Islam is inherent to many countries in the arabs. Islamophobia is a form of racism.
EDIT: Just checked, wikipedia agrees.
The ban, which applies to nearly 9.5 million civilian men aged 18 to 60 in Ukraine, has separated families, trapped college students and other nonresidents inside the country, and limited the freedom of movement of transgender women.
AMHERST — Far-reaching implications of a travel ban on men imposed by the Ukrainian government shortly after the invasion last year, according to a new report from The Human Security Lab at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
The ban, which applies to nearly 9.5 million civilian men aged 18 to 60 in Ukraine, has separated families, trapped college students and other nonresidents inside the country, and limited the freedom of movement of transgender women.
Russia’s war on Ukraine recently passed 500 days.
Among the report’s findings:
- the ban leaves civilian men vulnerable to gender-selective massacres;
- the policy is broadly unpopular among the Ukrainian public;
- the travel ban is inconsistent with international human rights standards during wartime;
- women, children and students are also adversely affected by the ban;
- lifting or relaxing the ban could increase morale, reduce corruption, align Ukraine with Europe rather than with Russia and increase financial giving from abroad;
- and that Ukrainians believe they can contribute to the war effort even if abroad.
The report is based on a comprehensive survey of more than 4,000 Ukrainian citizens, analyses of citizen comments on petitions to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy urging him to lift the ban, and numerous consultations with experts and civil-society organizations.
A third night of Russian attacks on Ukrainian targets in the country's southern port region caused multiple casualties while destroying vital Ukrainian infrastructure.
Canadian leader reiterates opposition to illegal settlements and urges Netanyahu to seek consensus for judicial plan.
> Canadian leader reiterates opposition to illegal settlements and urges Netanyahu to seek consensus for judicial plan.
> Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has expressed concern about Israel’s policies, saying that he has no immediate plans to invite his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to the country.
> Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Trudeau reiterated Canada’s opposition to Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, which are illegal under international law.
> “We recognise the violence going on right now. It is difficult for people across the region — both Israelis and Palestinians,” the Canadian prime minister said.
> “We’re calling for de-escalation and peace and working through some of the flashpoints that are happening. Canada has a longstanding position that settlements and the settlement process is illegal. And we need to stand against that.”