Es lohnt sich auch jetzt schon richtig krass. 2-4 Jahre Amortisation, weniger wenn deine Stadt/dein Bundesland eine Förderung hat. Bei Lebenszeiten von 10 Jahren für den Wechselrichter und 30 Jahren für die Solarpanels.
Das Problem mit rückwärts laufenden Zählern sind prinzipiell halt die Kosten für die Netzinfrastruktur. Man kann jetzt streiten wie hoch die Vergütung für eingespeisten Strom sein soll, aber dass es nicht die vollen 30-40ct sind, die man für Strombezug zahlt, macht Sinn.
Ich könnte mir einen Stromvertrag vorstellen, bei dem der Grundbetrag ungewöhnlich hoch ist, aber der Netzbetreiber einem dann erlaubt mit Ferraris Zähler ein Balkonkraftwerk zu betreiben. Oder beim digitalen Zähler das netto abrechnet, nicht das brutto.
I would love to see this data, can you link it? Either a paper by unaffiliated researchers or the raw data is fine.
I am aware their marketing pushes the "10x better" number. But I have yet to see the actual data to back this claim.
That is the new system. Tesla has no equivalent to it. Or to phrase it differently:
Drivers can not activate teslas’s equivalent technology, no matter what conditions are met, including not in heavy traffic jams, not during the daytime, not on spec ific California and Nevada freeways, and not when the car is traveling less than 40 mph. Drivers can never focus on other activities. The technology does not exist in Tesla vehicles
If you are talking about automatic lane change, auto park, etc (what tesla calls autopilot or full self driving) these are all features you can find in most if not all high end cars nowadays.
The new system gets press coverage, because as I understand it, if there is an accident while the system is engaged Mercedes will assume financial and legal responsibility and e.g. cover all expenses that result from said accident. Tesla doesn't do that.
Also, it's hard to argue "full self driving" means anything but the car is able to drive fully autonomously. If they were to market it as "advanced driver assist" I'd have no issue with it.
Definitely won't get an argument from me there. FSD certainly isn't in a state to really be called that yet. Although, to be fair, when signing up for it, and when activating it there are a lot of notices that it is in testing and will not operate as expected.
At what point do we start actually expecting and enforcing that people be responsible with potentially dangerous things in daily life, instead of just blaming a company for not putting enough warnings or barriers to entry?
Then the issue is simply what we perceive as the predominant marketing message. I know that in all legally binding material Tesla states what exactly the system is capable of and how alert the driver needs to be. But in my opinion that is vastly overshadowed by the advertising Tesla runs for their FSD capability. They show a 5 second message about how they are required by law to warn you about being alert at all times, before showing the car driving itself for 3 minutes, with the demo driver having the hands completely off the wheel.
So weit ich weiß leider ja. Wieland Steckdose ist auch noch offiziell nötig, da die neue norm, die auch Schukostecker erlaubt, noch erarbeitet werden muss.
Falls jemand ne qualifizierte Quelle hat die das Gegenteil (bezüglich Vorlagen, die der Mieter machen darf) behauptet bitte her damit!
Hab ich auch erst letztens gelernt, aber der Link redet nur von Smartmetern. Das sind moderne Messanlagen mit Funk. Würde mich stark wundern wenn dass Österreich so flächendeckend verbauen will.
Fur ein Balkonkraftwerk braucht man kein Smartmeter, sondern eine sogenannte moderne Messanlage. Beide können den Strom rein und raus separat messen, aber die Smartmeter haben noch ein Funkmodul um live Daten zu verschicken.
Wundert mich nicht, dass so wenig funk verbaut wird. Ist vermutlich eine ganze Ecke teurer and liefert vermutlich nur wenig Nutzen.
It also fails to mention how the accident rate compares to human drivers.
That may be because Tesla refuses to publish proper data on this, lol.
Yeah, they claim it's ten times better than a human driver, but none of their analysis methods or data points are available to independent researchers. It's just marketing.
What Tesla is (falsely IMO) advertising as "full self driving" is available in all new Mercedes vehicles as well and works anywhere in the US.
Mercedes is in the news for expanding that functionality to a level where they are willing to take liability if the vehicle causes a crash during this new mode. Tesla does not do that.
I'd wager most people, when talking about a plane's autopilot mean the follow waypoints or Autoland capability.
Also, it's hard to argue "full self driving" means anything but the car is able to drive fully autonomously. If they were to market it as "advanced driver assist" I'd have no issue with it.
Your wording makes me believe my comment came across as much more serious as intended.
Also, assuming you really did take that experience to heart I am not criticising you. I am criticising the actions of someone with less life experience, who no longer exists (they have been replaced with the smart you).
I'm usually watching at 2.5-3.0 times speed. I turn down the speed either for A: entertainment (movies simply have a sort of pacing that is not so nice to interrupt (compared to any random YouTube video)), or B: because the content is sooo good and information dense that the limiting factor is no longer audio processing, but following the reasoning of the content. Those are the videos I love most.
Es lohnt sich auch jetzt schon richtig krass. 2-4 Jahre Amortisation, weniger wenn deine Stadt/dein Bundesland eine Förderung hat. Bei Lebenszeiten von 10 Jahren für den Wechselrichter und 30 Jahren für die Solarpanels.
Das Problem mit rückwärts laufenden Zählern sind prinzipiell halt die Kosten für die Netzinfrastruktur. Man kann jetzt streiten wie hoch die Vergütung für eingespeisten Strom sein soll, aber dass es nicht die vollen 30-40ct sind, die man für Strombezug zahlt, macht Sinn.
Ich könnte mir einen Stromvertrag vorstellen, bei dem der Grundbetrag ungewöhnlich hoch ist, aber der Netzbetreiber einem dann erlaubt mit Ferraris Zähler ein Balkonkraftwerk zu betreiben. Oder beim digitalen Zähler das netto abrechnet, nicht das brutto.