Squiddork @ Squiddork @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

5

Joined

1 wk. ago

If you read the paper, it assumes a 100% absorption rate of the heavy metals emitted.

I'm not here to defend vapes but I think that is a seriously overlooked flaw in this study. Most people don't puff a cigarette/vape and hold it in their lungs until it's completely absorbed.

Couldn't see anything about the bioavailability of these carcinogens via lungs factored into the absorption rate either.

Ontop of that the sample size from this study is abysmal and from the same manufacturer and there is also a declared conflict of interest.

IMO more studies need to be done before we can conclusively determine the damage and risks of disposable vapes.

And they have the gall to act like they're better than you because you're working a mininum wage job on a Sunday.

Yeah as a chef I only learnt how to dice, chiffonade, brunoise, batonnete, julienne and tourne all sorts of food cause it looks cool.

Different shapes and sizes is extremely important, it's why salt flakes taste different to iodized salt because of surface area or why a thicker slice of ham will taste different to a thinner one.

Also if you cant cut something consistently half of its going to overcook and half of its going to undercook.

Opened the comments before reading the article and thought your quote was a comment by someone about Musk hahaha

Yeah this has been around for some time now, here's a paper on the implementation of it.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00250