As others have clarified the 18 year is just about (or is) appropriate. I do think we will see an influx of younger court justices (hopefully!) and having an appealing career tenure would ideally incentivize younger folks persuing that position
I want to first point out term limits are necessary and I think we need more term limits!
However 18yrs does seem just a bit too short, maybe closer to 24 or 30yr so it can span an entire "normal" career length.
Keep in mind the idea of these lifetime appointments is so you dont spend years of college and your youth learning boring law stuff only to be able to keep a job for a few years. Imagine going to college, training in law for years, only to know after 18yrs you will have to go back to regular attorney work
Having guaranteed career tenures is solely there to incentivize younger people to become a justice
"She fell out of the window of her apartment, unfortunately, it was not possible to save her, the injuries she received were incompatible with life," the source said.
Yeah being a western supporter in Russia is 'incompatible with life'
But the guy has a point, the bone was large enough to hurt him. Its advertised as boneless, because (as the justices even agree) it shouldnt have bones
What if something said nut-free or allergy free but contained tree nuts? I would hope the company selling that product would be liable
I hope at least the company went as far to pay for his medical bills. I think that's warranted
Wasnt she a part of the shootout in the hangar when Po tries to take command? I'm a bit hazy on her being in action too