Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)QH
Posts
0
Comments
219
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • If your employer fires you suddenly for no reason, there’s no real consequences.

    Depends on the industry and location. If they do that a few times in relatively small industry, or in a captured but small market, word gets around and suddenly that company has difficulty hiring in the future.

  • How is either a better or more affordable option than a cheap helicopter? Air taxis using helicopter have existed for decades and fly around urban areas every single day.

    Will people still need a pilot's license and all of the associated time + training that requires? Because they will surely also need to have a driver's license and insurance and everything else required of owning a car!

    I do not understand the appeal at all unless it's just a refusal to give up on a very specific childhood nostalgia.

  • They are not regular civilians, they are public servants and act on behalf of the government. If they want to give up qualified immunity and other special protections that normal citizens don't have, then we can revisit this definition.

    Similar to how FBI or IRS agents are not the same as regular citizens but also aren't members of any military branch.

  • the fact the police are people and some have families and their own wants and needs will mess with anyone’s line of thinking.

    Almost like they should be carefully evaluated and trained to make sure they can properly handle tense situations.

    Police have to be ready to risk opening the door to confirm a dangerous suspect before they use force to try and save themselves.

    Not if they are protected by every level of the system from any possible consequences. So much easier to just assume all citizens are a potential enemy and go in gun's blazing. Just to be safe (for themselves).

  • Computer manufacturers aren't making AI software. If someone uses an HP copier to make illegal copies of a book and then distributes those pages to other people for free, the person that used the copier is breaking the law, not the company that made the copier.

  • It's just a natural extension of the concept that entities have some kind of ownership of their creation and thus some say over how it's used. We already do this for humans and human-based organizations, so why would a program not need to follow the same rules?