Prunebutt @ Prunebutt @slrpnk.net

Posts

56

Comments

3,070

Joined

1 yr. ago

True. But depending on how much you pixellate that, those features are still commonlyseen when the faces are blurred.

Those are faceswapped. (Which shows how effective this is ;)

Check it with the original.

Why do publishers increase the price of games, though? It's not like the price of the rare components to make games increased.

Clair Obscur (a gorgeous, new game) is 50 bucks. I rest my case.

Where exactly? I couldn't find any missed faces.

It's not perfect, but for that stuff, I'd use SweetHome3D.

I got my mom hooked on Plants vs Zombies that one time.

The point of blurring your face is to not attach it to your identity.

So is faceswapping

I was hoping for some more automated and clean looking solution. But thanks anyway.

I can't make myself watch this obvious AI slop, sorry.

I found a github repo which uses insightface to do the exact job I wanted. I needed to fix the code a bit, but I managed to faceswap the crew of Star Trek TNG on the faces of these protestors who I found on a image search engine:

Bonus - Diego Luna on some stock image:

What am i missing?

Basically every bit of context.

I asked about software to faceswap photos for when my org wants to publish a pic were everyone who is on it doesn't have to pixellate the faces, but rather faceswap the faces with other people (generated faces, historical figures, etc.).

I'd like to try that since everytime my org wants to take a photo (e.g. for showing international solidarity on social media), an argument arises of whether or not to pixellate the faces. Some people want their identities protected, other people think that pixellated faces damages public perception of the org.

How is that relating to anything you say?

How do I want to "endanger people" if I want to hide the faces of people in my org? WTF is wrong with you?

A focus on organizing in horizontal power structures.

It's even available in audiobook form by audible anarchism

I already saidethat I am not interested in this discussion. Ask the people in my org. It always comes up when we're doing some solidarity photo.

I'm not really interested in this kind of discussion. I was asking for a tool, not for a discussion of wether or not to use that tool.

That's good for you, butedoesn't apply to everyone.

Especially if both sides are fucking masked!

I'm not talking about the current situation in the US. I'm talking about e.g. protest in Europe which aren't necessarily as heated up as the protests in LA right now. That might have not come across, sorry.

It's just more friendly to non-radicalised folks if the sharepic of the local union don't show up in balaclavas.

That's from Toy Story 3, though.