Geemany, is that where the cricket got his name?

They're allowed to do whatever their shareholders let them get away with.

All research and successful drug policy SHOWS that treatment should be increased! And law enforcement decreased while abolishing Mandatory Minimum Sentences!

You mean the fruit that I just saw an article about because climate change is ruining it's lifecycle? I doubt.

I mean, I'm quoting one of the most popular sitcoms ever, I'm not exactly Mr. Original either, lol

You mean Taskmaster's Matt Hancock?

I think the Problem of Evil actually makes sense when you consider eternity and infinity. The infinity that God is and Eternity that Heaven is, earthly sufferings really will be seen to be nothing. You probably don't worry about that exam anymore that you were studying for as a kid.

That's moral relativism to a T. The evil perpetrated by God on humans via unnecessary pain, disease, and death is relatively moral given the vastness of eternity. Basically you're saying it's ok for a god to create little playthings to torture because it lives a long time. I disagree.

What false negative? If he can lift it then he didn't create a stone he can't lift. Can he make one plus one equal anything other than two?

Don't forget the ancestral dirt, can't sleep without that.

If you listen to him talk about any subject, not just politics, it's very clear his idea of the world hasn't changed a single nanometer since he was prepubescent.

Actually the easiest answer is "no" because it doesn't require cognitive dissonance.

Definitely the superior Brandy, by far.

Sorry, but Biblical scholars' proof of the resurrection is from the Bible? You see how that's not convincing right?

God created sin and hell, it didn't need to do that. After three decades as a Christian, the best answer I could get to the question "Why did God make the universe and us in it?" was "so we could praise it for eternity in heaven." So it could have just created us in heaven already. Instead it created a whole universe of randomness and ever-increasing chaos, stuck us in it and said, "You better love me and follow these very specific, often inane and arbitrary rules, or I'll send you to this other place I made where all you feel is pain for eternity." The god of the Bible is an egomaniacal sadist and it's not worthy of your praise.

But the moral code of the Bible is strict and unchangeable. Yet you yourself believe morality is relative. Why then are you content letting this being you admit has no capability for relativistic perspective judge our eternal souls based on said unchangeable moral code? Seems pretty illogical.

I am

Chubby's kind of a weirdo anyway, I'm fine with that. "Twist Again" isn't gonna make much sense anymore, but it's no great loss.

The apple falls next to a tree trunk, the cucumber falls next to vines and leaves near the ground. You wrong.

Yeah, the comic is called Foxes in Love, they're very clearly supposed to be partners. It's just not comical in any way I can deduce.

It's "Moops"

Give it to me straight like a pear cider that's made with 100% pears.