The first thing I do is try to stop and identify what I'm angry about or frustrated with.
Then I check to see if it's something I can control, and if it's not then I just accept it. I might not like it, but I accept that it's the way things are.
For example I (used to) get angry driving. What I was angry with were bad drivers.
Is it reasonable to expect to drive and not run into bad drivers? No, they're out there and there's nothing you can do a bout it.
What I can do about it is change my reaction. Instead of raging at bad drivers I simply shake my head and continue about my day.
Think of it like you're holding a hulu-hoop. Inside that hulu-hoop are things you can change. Outside the hula-hoop are things you can't change. Getting mad at things you can't change isn't helpful, so concentrate on the things you can control, including your reaction.
edit: You know down voting something doesn't make it untrue? This is true whether you like it or not.
Every time I ask for "capitalism" problems I get answers about what the government does.
"too big to fail"? Government bailouts.
"antitrust"? Government granted monopolies and making the laws so that barriers to entry are too big.
"police shootings" Government gang.
"inflation"? Government monetary policy.
"colonization"? Government expansion
"not enough social programs"? Government policy.
Then you've got the sub-70s who go on about "exploitation" which is rooted entirely in fiction.
Life requires work. All life everywhere. Humans aren't exempt from this; demanding that others do all your work and provide for you or free isn't going to work.
Some of these people would complain that they have to chew their own food.
People forget that capitalism has lifted literally billions of people out of poverty, it's advanced our technology to where it's basically magic. It increased the amount of food we can grow with fewer people allowing people to move past subsistence farming (which many socialist countries reverted to).
Capitalism uses people greed to provide better, cheaper, faster versions of things..
Then the government gets involved and instead of blaming the government they're told to blame capitalism, so they do.
If the AI doesn’t have good goals programmed in, we’re fucked
When they built a new building at my college they decided to to use "AI" (back when SunOS ruled the world) to determine the most efficient route for the elevator to take.
The parameter they gave it to measure was "how long does each wait to get to their floor". So it optimized for that and found it could get it down to 0 by never letting anyone get on, so they never got to their floor, so their wait time was unset (which = 0).
They tweaked the parameters to ensure everyone got to their floor and as far as I can tell it worked well. I never had to wait much for an elevator.
Yeah, for enterprise you aren't going to roll it out yourself. They'd use a partner company to help you set it up and configure it for their needs to ensure that it can continue to scale and provide monitoring solutions. It's too much for one person to do that.
Where are you hosting it? Onsite? Megacorporation's clod solution? Your cable line? What's your data recovery plan? 200+ users can generate a lot of data. What's the security plan? You do know how to harden every aspect of each subsystem, right? What's the monitoring plan? Not just "is it down" but way more granular for each subsystem. How many tech and phone support people will be on call to help?
You could probably roll it out in a way that would work, but at that scale you should really be using a pro. Especially for a "friend". Don't want a tech problem to kill that friendship.
Older Americans thank SCOUTS, GOP for not saddling us with your student debt,
I don't want to pay for your shitty degree.
This is a middle finger to everyone who didn't go to college because they couldn't afford it. So again it's going to be the poor paying for the middle/upper class.
Because the left has decided giving money to Ukraine is Good™ therefore anyone who has any other ideas about the situation is Bad™. Not to mention it's members of the party of Evil™ who believe something Bad™.
Personally I'm for donating to Ukraine.
You don't have to agree with them, but there are valid reasons:
Representation: My constitutes don't want X and I'm here to represent them.
Problems at home: We have a shitload of problems at home that could use that money.
Budgetary: If you think the debt / deficit is a pressing concern, see "Problems at home".
The Russians are the Good Guys™ (Takes some mental gymnastics to get there)
Escalation: Funding one side could lead to a bigger conflict
Isolationism: Not our problem. We're not the world's police
Pacifism: No violence, ever.
And some not quite so valid "reasons":
The "other side" wants it, so I'll vote against it
My campaign contributor needs something.
This will help me get into the news/votes!
I can use this vote later to prove i'm not a "war hawk".
I got paid a lot!
It can sometimes be hard to tell if a person's given reason matches their true reason, sometimes it's not. Your existing biases will influence what you think about that.
LOL, about half the points in the article are struck through now. Yet another "journalist" who doesn't understand how anything works getting angry how they way they imagine it works.
There's always pushups!