JayTreeman [none/use name] @ JayTreeman @hexbear.net

Posts

0

Comments

199

Joined

1 yr. ago

OK. But has anyone tried it?

I really wish there was some way to know how effective the last Israeli attack on Iran was. I saw video that showed a lot of stuff getting shot down, but I never verified the video. I'll never trust the IDF, but they claimed a wild success. I haven't heard much from iran except that a few soldiers may have died. It's stupid to trust any one source, so I'm stuck in a weeks long curiosity

I've got a similar situation. I've heard a couple of times 'its a complicated situation' WHAT'S COMPLICATED ABOUT STANDING AGAINST GENOCIDE???? I'm a little butt hurt about it

The fact that they didn't attempt to laugh with you shows you don't want to be around them. Everybody farts.

Takes the same amount of effort to draw, but the energy needed to hold and therefore aim is substantially less. They normally refer to 'let off' in the specifications. 75% let off means that with a 100lb bow, once you get to a specific point in the draw, you're only holding 25lbs.

I can't believe I forgot about that episode! There's two that deal with this subject!

Lol he did! There's an episode about it! (9th episode of season 8)

I listened to one of her podcasts, and she comes across as so genuine. I can totally see why people listen to her.

I'm very mistrusting of anyone online that calls them self an anarchist. I spent some time on some anarchist subreddits some time ago. They were pretty toxic and would throw out reasonable opinions because they didn't align with their personal theory. The ones I've met in person are reasonable compassionate people that are more likely to take people's opinions and view them as valuable. I sometimes picture the real difference between the theories as a top down vs bottom up approach. Marxist states shouldn't exist when communism is achieved, and that's pretty anarchist. It's more about how to get there. We shouldn't be fighting about that.

Well said. The real difference is Marxists want the transitional state while anarchists see that transitional state as problematic as well. My clumsy analogy is socdems vs socialists

I largely agree with you. My sticking point is the 'anarchists want to be liked by liberals'. The anarchists I know acknowledge that working with the commies is how to move forward. At least commies acknowledge the importance of mutual aid and community. Liberals don't. No one likes a liberal

TIL a lot of people have a hate boner for anarchists.... Wow

From an anarchist perspective, the state is the problem. From an anarchist perspective, every state ends in some type of abuse towards citizens. The Soviet Union was a collection of states. I don't disagree with you, but I think there's also a theory reason. Keep up the good fight

This was a referendum on biden. People don't like him. They voted him out, and at every opportunity Harris showed that besides the gender, age and race, they were the same person

MSM: why would we cover third parties between election cycles? That's ridiculous. General population: These people only pop up when it's time to get elected! It's all a grift.

This is a reasonable response by someone trying to stop an escalation. The guy that's got no power to stop an escalation, but can hope that some Iranian can read between the lines. The guy that made that statement is probably not who I'm talking about

White's a construct. Italians and Greeks weren't white 50 years ago, but to answer your question, depends who you ask

The comments... Yikes

My small pedantic addition to your good comment: neolibs are neocons. They share the same ideology. They both think Thatcher was good

You reminded me of the town hall where newsy Steve martin asked her about whether they need a border wall and the discussion went something like: 'trump was bad at it.' 'But do we need it' 'Democrats are better at building it. Remember how much of a liar Trump is?'