Du wirst lachen, aber tatsächlich werden Strategien wie zB shared desk eingesetzt mit den gezielten Nebeneffekt, sich von nicht-wandlungsfähigen MA zu trennen, die nicht mehr zur Unternehmenskultur passen. Nicht missverstehen, ich bin da ambivalent bzw. ich finde es vollkommen legitim sich einen AG zu suchen, der gut zu einem passt. Ich will nur den Hinweis geben, dass MA-Abgang in den meisten Fällen nicht nur einkalkuliert, sondern regelrecht erwünscht ist. Das macht Platz jüngere, flexiblere und billigere MA. Der Verlust an Expertise wird dabei bewusst in Kauf genommen.
Das magste jetzt vielleicht nicht hören, aber das ist nicht nur subjektiv sondern in einer Welt wo regelmässig vom Home Office aus gearbeitet werden kann, weder zeitgemäss, noch nachhaltig, noch wirtschaftlich sinnvoll.
Die 90er waren auch zugebenermassen weniger kompakt und mobil. Da wurde ja noch mit Akten und Ordner gearbeitet. Was brauchste du Heute noch ausser deinem Lappy?
What's your use case? If LibreTorrent is making your phone explode, you might want to run qbittorrent on a separate machine and use their web interface.
I would love to use the KApps for Calendar / Contacts / Mail for a better integration into KDE. But at this point Thunderbird is just so far ahead, I'm not sure KDE will be able to close the gap to make those apps a viable alternative
Not binary in this context means, that there isn't two opposing choices (true or false, black or white, greedy or generous). We're rather looking at a scale in between opposing concepts.
That's an interesting question that has been been asked a lot in philosophy / theology.
My take is basically is, that the premise is already flawed. Negative traits are not binary. When does industriousness become greed, assertiveness become ego, etc...? Everything lives on a scale. So where is the cut off? Is there an objective cut off? Isn't rather someones industriousness someone elses greed? Then wouldn't the absence of all greed also kill all industriousness? In that case @treadful@lemmy.zip would probably be right, civilisation would have a hard time existing.
Islamic theology has a take on it, that I find more logical. Basically angels are like humans but without free will. So they do have all the traits humans do, but cannot act on it, except when deemed acceptable by a perfect being. That way they managed to create a perfect community.
We have a similar thing going. But my kids are getting to an age where they wanna use tiktok and post on insta. I think that beyond the privacy issues it's actually a mental health risk. My wife thinks being excluded from what their peers are doing is an even bigger health hasard.
This is dangerously wrong. This is a classic foot-in-the-door law. They test the waters with something nobody can argue against, like piracy, child porn, terrorism. Then the censoring gets broader and broader until you can't access left-wing stuff anymore because it's anti-governmental. There is a very specific, very dangerous purpose in mind.
100% with you on this regarding relations with adults. But children is where it gets spicy. Like, for me, I genuinely believe I'm not doing my job as a father if I don't protect my children from google, meta, etc... My wife genuinely thinks she needs to protect them from me so that I don't ostrasize them from their peers. It's a real issue...
