I look at it like this, if I do miss something with one char, I'll see something new the next time. It's probably pretty much impossible to see everything in one run, anyway. The game usually tells you when there's urgency and waiting too long would have consequences, so that might be comforting to know.
Why does this even matter? I don't understand why tournaments are segregated. Chess isn't a physical sport, it's a strategy game, and neither sex has an advantage.
Users need more control over the kind of content they want to see. The problem Lemmy has is very similar to the main problem with the internet as a whole: the current model is that of a "regulator" who controls the flow of information for us.
What I'd like to see is giving users the tools to filter for themselves, which means the internet as a whole. Not interested in sports, let me filter it all out by myself, instead of blocking individual parts piecemeal.
The problem is that no company has an incentive to work on something like that, and I wouldn't even know where to start designing such interface tools on my own, but there is, for example, a keyword blocker for YouTube that prevents video that contain said terms from appearing on my timeline. I've used it to block everything "Trump", for example. I'd like to see more of that.
The moment your elderly mom has a stroke on the toilet, you'll look back at all the times you got the door in your face and be grateful. What a tiny price to pay for the life of your mother.
What's his name, Trump?