Rule of the queen GOAT
EmptySlime @ EmptySlime @lemmy.blahaj.zone Posts 0Comments 560Joined 2 yr. ago
Hey! Don't you dare call Riley Gaines a cunt! The noble cunt does not deserve to be compared to that vile person. People generally like cunts.
All jokes aside though yeah she needs to fuck all the way off.
"I struggle with lustful thoughts when I stare at men's asses and have to actively stop myself from acting on them. Therefore all men struggle with the same thoughts, being gay is a choice, and those who chose to be gay are simply evil degenerates." Basically
For real. How can any of us hope to match their purity? We should give up now. They are truly the best advocate for LGBTQ+ rights.
Where did any of this say that the majority of homophobes are self hating gays? It's a joke about the incredible amount of male anti-gay politicians that have literally been caught in sexual acts with other men. What are we? Not allowed to use hyperbole for the sake of comedy?
"Man I hate squares..." "How dare you slander all rectangles like that." "Not all rectangles are squares dude."
Better for the early game, sure. But have you seen the stats on some of those late game cat evolutions? The dog line starts having serious type disadvantages when you're getting ready to challenge the gym at Waco.
I mean I'm sorry what?
You mean the thing that allows the president to remove people from the US according to famed puppy killer Kristi Noem?
That's what he's trying to enforce you silly goat! Those filthy protestors are trying to stop ICE from doing just that. /s
Bet these ghouls are just salivating at the potential justification to invoke the insurrection act.
I had to think way too long about what you said there to finally get it. Sometimes I'm way too ace for the internet I swear. I sat here for several minutes like "What the heck do they mean? They're just looking for a specific pattern in the phone's gyro sensors and accelerometer. Why would that be interesting?"
It threw me a little. And I even thought it might have been a dirty joke but I couldn't find it because in my mind if you're using your phone for that you're trying to keep it as steady as possible. Gods I'm dumb.
If you didn't set those up yourself it might be a model thing to have those by default. On my Moto G 5G the power button thing isn't bound by default. Though the volume button media thing is set for when the screen is off. There's a section in the settings for gestures with all of them.
Options for my model at least have a couple cool "kinetic gestures" as they call them. If you hold the phone in one hand and make 2 quick chopping motions it'll turn on the flashlight, if you instead twist your wrist back and forth twice quickly that'll open up the camera. Both work even if the phone is locked.
Might have to look into that island app though.
Walz seems to correctly understand that most of the everyday people who oppose allowing trans athletes to compete are having a gut reaction and aren't against trans people. They simply "know" that boys are generally stronger than girls, so even if they believe trans women are women, they still believe that they'd have an unfair advantage competing with cis women.
This means they can be moved away from that erroneous position. Most of these people have no idea that there are already protocols for this to make sure there's no unfair advantage. They don't know that after what was it? 2 years on HRT that something like 99% of any advantage a trans woman may have had from going through a male puberty is gone. Most of these people have never even heard of a trans woman competing in women's sports. There are what? Something like under a hundred in the entire US?
The first most people probably heard about the entire concept was hearing that Lia Thomas "beat" a cis woman. But not that they were actually tied for fucking fifth place. I know most people that were outraged about it that I've told that were shocked. Straight up went from "this is so unfair, they shouldn't have let her compete," to "they're this mad that she got FIFTH?"
Yeah the joke is meant to be lampooning that rightoid tendency to get pissy when brands support queer people. The rightoid would be mad that Overwatch was involved in Pride and drop Overwatch. OP inverted it, dropping Pride because they associate with Overwatch.
You mean Timothy Daniel Pool? The same Timothy Daniel Pool that constantly wears a beanie even if it's wildly inappropriate to be doing so for wherever he is because he's insecure about his hair loss and viciously attacks anyone who even remotely insinuates that this is what's happening? That guy? Yeah pretty sure.
Yeah I can kinda force it to look upside down if I try to like unfocus but they appeared face up from the get go for me except maybe the top middle one?
Edit: interestingly when I saw the smaller preview image upon sending this to my partner then I could see it upside down.
Yep. Even in the "best case" scenario where none of the "talent" at Tenet was being directly told what to say, the disinfo people being like "Hey big dog, love what you're doing. Here's an ungodly amount of money to keep doing it," isn't functionally any different. It only means they potentially didn't directly commit the crime of being an unregistered foreign agent or whatever the wording is.
They just found somebody prominent that was already saying most of what they wanted to pay someone directly to say and basically got them for a discount because they didn't need to convince them to say it.
He's an alt-right pundit that tries to pretend he isn't right wing. But who only ever seems to have mild disagreements with right wing figures while he attacks the left. His Wikipedia article has a "Views" section that does a pretty good job illustrating why he is... Not great let's say.
Yeah there wasn't a good reason to make Einhorn trans. I don't think they intended it as a broad commentary on trans people generally and that it was just supposed to be "this guy was so messed up after that botched kick that this is how far he went to get revenge." But it doesn't really matter what they intended if the result was just having their villain be an unhinged trans woman.
That's not even to say you can't have the villain be a trans woman either. They could easily just have had the broken Ray Finkle get therapy, realize that he was actually she and rebuild her life, then finally as she's got her life back and she was finally happy again who happens to show up and ruin everything yet again? Dan fucking Marino. Basically the entire fucking movie could have happened the same way. She could even still have killed Podacter for finding out about "her past" as they more crudely put it, but you'd probably want to make it where he was going to blackmail her or something. Idk.
Something something accusing their opposition of doing the thing that they either are currently doing, or 100% would be doing if they had the opportunity.
Multiple cis women even!