scrolling thru it rule
You're mostly right. Newer devices won't share their entire app list by default, at compile time you need to enumerate every app you want to query for, or add what are essentially a list of intent filters (which are like "I want to talk to apps that take this kind of message and payload"). There is still a permission that lets you list all apps like you were able to on pre API 30 devices, but Google makes it pretty difficult to get onto the app store in that state.
You can still send intents as much as you like though (as long as you know the recipient), since they're the basis for all inter-process communication.
My point is more that an app developer can't and doesn't need to use the play store to get the list of apps you have on your phone. This requirement to have the play store almost certainly isn't malicious and I disagree with the notion that apps shouldn't be able to use what is essentially system infrastructure to improve their apps. That said, given this is an app targeting the fediverse, it would have been nice for the developer to have made a universal APK build that didn't require the Play Store.
If this error message is actually talking about Google Play, not Google Play Services, I would bet that it is because it employs Dynamic Feature Modules; something which can only be delivered over the Play Store infrastructure. They're pretty common in modern Android development since they can substantially improve the user experience for users with Google Play enabled (which is most of them).
Also, I am aware this is being pedantic, but Android just straight up already has an API to get every installed app on your device and interact with it, even on a de-googled phone.
I lived near this sign and passed it a dozen times, they only took it down in the last few years. It was pretty infamous, even before it hit the internet.
Ok rather than responding in kind with some snarky comment, I'm going to make a good faith effort explain what I mean.
My statement that "beauty standards are based in white supremacy" is talking about what we, as a whole society, consider attractive. I am not talking about your personal taste, I am talking about the kinds of bodies, faces, and styles that are elevated in society and pointing our their basis in white supremacy.
Firstly, we need to understand that beauty standards are not some platonic ideal of beauty, they are socially constructed and therefore informed by the society in which they exist. This also necessarily means that current standards are an evolution of historical standards, reciprocally changing as people both influence the standards and are influenced by them.
That means that if we want to understand today's beauty standards, we also need to consider them in a historical context. I hope it is not a controversial point to say that most white countries (i.e. Australia where I live, and the US where much of the discussion often centres) were historically white supremacist (if not presently, but that is a different can of worms). Like they openly stated it (i.e. "White Australia" being official policy) and legally elevated whites, this isn't up for discussion. I would hope it is not difficult to imagine that such a society would also base its definitions of beauty around white features: white skin, white facial features, blonde hair, etc. A cliche example of this would be the historical masculinization of African-American people and their bodies. Pernicious stereotypes like "Jezebel", "Sapphire", and more modern incarnations like "Angry Black Woman" are prime examples of this, where black women are given qualities or cast into roles considered, in a societal context, incompatible with femininity or even outright masculine.
Therefore, to evaluate my claim that beauty standards are "based in white supremacy", we need to determine whether our standards have substantially deviated from that history. I would argue it has not, that our beauty standards are clearly descendant. To look at the modelling industry as a prominent signifier, even with notional improvements in the diversity of models, the presence of eurocentric features is largely maintained (see 1, 2, 3). That is not to say there isn't work, particularly from passionate activists, to move on from this history - but we are not there yet.
Finally, in regards to this entire thread, I want to point out that, due to the global hegemonic nature of whiteness - historically and presently - to some uneducated eyes the premise of my argument here - that beauty standards are not objective but subjective and socially constructed - may be dismissed out of hand. A naive look at other prominent non-white cultures that attempt to recreate the aesthetics of white beauty standards (i.e. skin lightening products in south-east asia) could appear to suggest that they may be formed from an objective standpoint. This is patently and obviously untrue. Other cultures and periods of time had extremely varied beauty standards to those we have today, and it is a blatant case of presentism and ignorance to assume that our particular version is "correct". We should be skeptical of claims that, unlike so many other aspects of society, beauty standards alone are not impacted by the global history of colonialism and the dominance of white countries globally.
- Beauty is not objective
- Beauty standards are based in white supremacy
- This post is really fucking weird.
That's fraud. The 5 minute business discussion can be written off, the remaining (let's say) 55 minutes cannot. Maybe it differs where you live, but where I do only travel between work destinations can be written off, so home to work doesn't count. Buying supplies for the office is a normal and valid expense, taking them home is theft and/or taxable
I briefly worked for a company who worked on household power technology. Their product would attempt to predict energy prices, weather patterns, and usage to sell your excess energy at peak prices. Like discussed in the article, this company collected usage data and controlled the sale of energy back to the grid centrally. They did this because it meant they could better train their prediction models and run them on more powerful hardware. The controllers would have needed internet connectivity anyway to query energy prices, and putting the prediction on device would have just made them more expensive and worse. Even when I worked there (back in 2015 I think), they were already very aware of the threat vectors discussed by this article and took some measures to prevent it.
In my opinion they were (/are, still exist) a responsible company run by competent people. They did not collect the data out of "greed", and I strongly suspect that the people in these comments implying that the data is collected to be sold have never actually worked in the industry and have very little idea of the specific value of energy usage data. I can't really speak authoritatively for other companies, but I would guess that, like the one I worked for, their products are internet connected simply because it improves the product. For example, people expect things to be controllable or viewable from an app from anywhere, and that requires internet connectivity.
Thank you, I try 🩷
I started transitioning a little over 3 years ago (I think? I might be 4 at this point), but only came out to my family a year ago (on Christmas to be exact). Gender dysphoria is like a weight, and for me, like you, it became all the more suffocating once I realised it was there. I had also been an ✨ally✨ to the community long enough that I knew how large and difficult of a life change transitioning would be, and I was worried I wouldn't even have the courage to transition or come out. That is to say, I get how you're feeling right now. I want to affirm that, no matter how far you go in your transition, no matter how it turns out, it gets better.
I'll talk about my personal experience first. After I realised I was trans, I came out to a close trans friend. We both started medically transitioning around that time, and soon after came out to the rest of my close friends as well. I was lucky in that these friends were already very queer and trans, so they were supportive. I definitely lost some friends outside that group though. Last Christmas, I came out to my parents in an ... inelegant... way. I was panicking, they already knew anyway (I was bad at hiding it), but it turned out okay. It took some adjustment, but they're accepting and I can't take that for granted. My crazy uncle disapproves, which I couldn't care less about. Just recently I finally went through the process of changing my name and gender legally, which was a headache but was still nice.
As for my advice, the first thing I'll say is that I cannot stress enough how much having a real ally or, even better, someone in the community to support you through your transition will help your mental health. You're probably going to quickly start experiencing creepy (because you're femme) and abusive men (because you're trans), however rarely. Someone who intimately understands what you're going through will help you work through that. For finding and forming community, I would be surprised if your university didn't have a trans group or something. Like, you're doing computer science, you'll already have tonnes in common with the women there.
The rest, is largely up to you. Experiment with your gender in "safe" ways if you aren't completely sure in your identity yet. That could involve dressing in women's clothes (keep in mind a lot might fit a bit weird right now), or by asking friends to experiment with different names and pronouns. I also found reading a great way to learn things about myself, some books I would recommend are Nevada by Imogen Binnie and A Safe Girl to Love by Casey Plett. They let you explore a variety of trans experiences and choices without having gone through them yourself. I also highly recommend watching The People's Joker too, but that's just because it's a really good and funny trans movie.
If you don't want to medically transition, that's totally fine (and anyone who says otherwise in this community will be banned). Otherwise, I cannot recommend at least HRT enough, especially if a significant source of your dysphoria is your body. It can do magic, particularly if you're young. I would suggest taking a look at this article on TransHub (which is a generally trusted source on trans stuff) for information about what to expect. It can help manage your dysphoria if you're not yet ready to come out socially, as I wasn't. Even after you've started HRT, you should be able to hide most of the visual changes effectively for at least a year or two. It is a great way to do something about your transition while you're building up your confidence to come out.
When it comes to coming out, i.e social transition, remember that no one is "owed" you coming out. When you are ready to come out, make sure you can do so safely. If you rely on your family for shelter or financial support, ensure you have contingency plans for housing or financial stability in case things go poorly (like find a friend who would be willing to host you for a while). Similar situation for work, while I'm pretty sure in the US it's technically illegal to discriminate against someone for being trans, that doesn't mean they won't. Try and gather the temperature of the room before making any decisions, and have a resume and linkedin profile ready in case things go poorly. Be prepared emotionally for the possibility that you may lose friends or family you care about. Remember above all that you deserve respect, and that you deserve to live authentically. If someone rejects you, or "accepts" you but undermine your identity, don't adjust your presentation and identity just for their comfort.
That ends my advice for the medical and social stuff, so let me just give you some practical advice:
- Find a trans specializing doctor, the trans health project maintains a list for the US. WPATH also maintains a directory.
- Invest in and get good at shaving. I would highly recommend learning to shave with a safety razor, with the caveat that you should avoid them if you think having the razors around could enable self harm. Nothing else will get as close a shave, and safety razors are dirt cheap ($30 - $80 for the handle, $20 - $30 for a 100 pack of blades). Having a good quality electric razor around is also very useful for a quick touch up, especially if you keep a lipstick style one in your car or bag.
- The page transfemme.style has some good advice on fashion
- Buy a sports bra if you start medically transitioning. You'll need to start wearing it before you think, and they'll fit most bodies pretty well. Get one with padding so you get some bigger boobs.
- At some point, graduate to a real bra. Get professionally fitted! I gained more cup sizes in that fitting than in three years of transitioning lol.
- If you feel dysphoric about shoulders in women's clothing, try tank tops. I fucking love tank tops.
- More generally for tops, a round or scoop neck piece of clothing will be most flattering. I don't like boat necks. Get something that fits properly, don't go too tight, even if it makes your boobs look great.
Couldn't find one, must be terminal
The problems in government are structural and systematic, not individual. The bureaucracy was built into what it is through the accumulation of regulations, poorly implemented policies and agendas, as well as plain mismanagement. Likewise, when the cost of a failed project is a political shitstorm and a parliamentary enquiry, and beyond that you are expected to be entirely accountable and transparent, you need to be risk averse.
You can't just fix these issues by proclaiming to fire everyone. You need to fix structural and leadership problems.
Also fun fact I can tell that Medicare (Australias one) definitely doesn't distinguish between trans and cis women because the week after I changed my name/gender I received a letter telling my I was due to get my cervix checked lol
I live in Australia, so YMMV, but for me, the things I needed to update were:
- Government/their services and programs, local and federal
- Medical things (insurance,, doctors, etc)
- Banks/Financial Institutions (I don't know how a 401k works, but that probably is included)
- Insurance
- Car registration
- Identity documents
- Wills, if you have one
- Company registrations, if you have one
Beyond that legal obligation, there is no one you have to tell if you don't feel comfortable. I took the opportunity of legally changing my name to finally come out in the rest of my life (work and uni), but you don't have to.
Lots of places already exclude hate speech from free speech, for an example I am familiar with (because I live there), Australia has a right to freedom of expression and opinion but does not protect speech that incites discrimination, among other things. As far as I'm concerned that is still a right to free speech, not the least because hate speech inherently limits the voice of its victims.
Changing docs is such a pain. Seemingly every system is set up exclusively expecting you to have changed your name through marriage, and thus have a marriage certificate. It's worth it though 🩷
Locked Removed
Cyber-Security Experts Warn Election Was Hacked; you might be able to save your hard-won rights.
Jump
Locking this post because it is quite obviously not trans related. Before I do so, I feel the need to address the content of these claims:
Stephen Spoonamore, on who's claims this article is based, is not a credible primary source. He has a history of claiming election fraud, for example the 2008 election, and the 2004 election. He has no background in cybersecurity or data science and his assertions are based largely on speculation.
His claims of how this conspiracy worked - that Musk collected voter information through his election lottery, monitored poll information transmitted through Starlink, then collaborated with Russia to incite false bomb threats as a distraction/to break chain of custody, while planting hundreds of thousands of "bullet ballots" (where the voter only voted for the presidential candidate and ignored down ballot) for Trump - is an insanely bold claim with surprisingly little evidence to support it. The supposed factual basis for Spoonamore's claim - that there was a statistically impossible number of these bullet ballots - is incorrect. As Snopes pointed out, he vastly overestimated/incorrectly calculated the number of these ballots.
Spoonamore claims that the only remedy to this fraud is to hand recount every ballot, something he also called for in his previous conspiracies. However, most of the states that Spoonamore listed already hand count a sample of ballots to check for discrepancies. Maybe it's his lack of data science experience, but these measures are sufficient to verify that the voting machines were not hacked.
We have extensive evidence and documentation of every other attempt by Trump to interfere with previous elections. This conspiracy would be even larger, even more complex, yet somehow executed perfectly at every step - except for their oversight of casting every ballot the exact same rather than casting a believable collection of down ballot votes. This is not a credible hypothesis without more evidence to support it.
I know the outcome of the US election is hard for most of the community to accept, but falling into conspiracies is a dangerous reaction. Now is a time to support each other and build local community. I would encourage people to look at Trans Resources and find a local support or advocacy organisation in their area. We need to amplify our voices and advocate for the protections and rights we deserve. Every action counts.
We do not tolerate misgendering in this community. The user in question has been banned, and this thread is being locked.
To my understanding the ruling doesn't affect impeachment. Trump's team argued that impeachment was the check and balance on presidential power iirc
Adorable