Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DO
Posts
0
Comments
102
Joined
2 mo. ago

  • The degree to which that's true is more due to survivorship bias and US culture than quality of theory or praxis imo, but regardless of reasoning I agree with your conclusion broadly. Internet "activism" involves way too much purity testing and not enough pragmatic engagement. The [org] that feeds the children gets my support, even if it happens to (somehow) be anarchist or trot.

    The second step after learning initial theory is going out and applying it, even if that means in a less-than-perfect org. The third step can then be critiquing the org and altering course, but too many leftist skip the real-life engagement part of the dialectic. My first org was a fairly radical DSA chapter and I met a lot of good people, including other MLs.

  • looking for a leftist group

    ask the representative if their org is anarchist or trot

    he doesn't understand

    pull out illustrated diagram explaing what is anarchist and what is trot

    he laughs and says "it's a good org sir"

    pay for membership

    its trot

    gonna give it an honest go because a lot of trots are still comrades but damn I wish there were more options lmao

  • Watching a dental lecture and the professor proudly talks about using ChatGPT for a case example. Lazy but whatever

    After presenting the case he asks students for first steps

    A few make suggestions, he singles out one as being too early in the process

    He then reads the ChatGPT response and it mentions that suggestion as the first step.

    He says, “ah, I was wrong, I guess you do do that first!”

    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  • We have will, it just isn't perfectly free. Our consciousness emerges out of a confluence of intersecting forces, and itself has the ability to influence the flows around it. But to pretend it's removed from those flows and forces, or exists in some vacuum, is nonsensical, as is pretending that there isn't some essence behind the signifier "self".

  • I just don't like them as signifiers in general, personally. They're shorthand for something but what that something is isn't clear to the listener nor even the speaker.

    It's not something I'd nitpick in general, and the examples you gave are harmless. But at best they're not very imaginitive or interesting descriptors, and at worst they're thought-limiting and tend to perpetuate dominant norms.

  • First they came for the White Nationalists

    And I did not speak out

    Because it was based

    Then they came for the pro-Whites

    And I did not speak out

    Because it was based

    Then they came for the pro-Western Culturists

    And I did not speak out

    Because it was based

    Then they came for the anti-Marxists

    And I did not speak out

    Because it was based

    Then they came for the Christians

    And I did not speak out

    Because it was based

    Then they came for the Whites

    And I did not speak out

    Because it was based

    Then I still did not speak out

    Because there was no one left

    to come after me