Ah, you're right - I misunderstood jbrain's point to just be about the "relative to the original" understanding. Guess I'm no smarter than Google's AI.
Yes, and the Google AI response is correct (and quite clear) in what it says. edit: Thanks Batman. I mean that Google's understanding of the question is logical (although still the maths is wrong as you say (now I've re-read you)) and its answer explained the angle it was answering from.
However, I think the reasonable assumption for the intention behind the question is relative to a whole. I had third of a pizza, and now I have an extra sixth of a pizza. It's subtle, but that's the kind of thing AI falls down on.
Perhaps Google's tried to make it run too cheaply - Kagi's one doesn't run unless you ask for it, and as a paid product it'll have different priorities.
Greg thinks that Rosie has low self esteem? That is absolutely not the impression I get from her.
It's been so long that I forgot about the hotdog.
I'm amazed how quickly the detective figured out the trick, and with the quotable logic of "He's Andy Zaltzman, he knows what velvet is!"
I'm kinda disappointed that Greg chickened out of double deductions: -3 × 2 = -6 as we learnt in primary school.
Hot sauce avoidance was genius, although I don't believe he actually knew the rules allowed it. On the other hand, Andy very was confident on that subject. yeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEES he was.
Andy's technique of throw high (and so land vertically) was my first thought.
Not funny, but interesting!