CrayonMaster @ CrayonMaster @midwest.social

Posts

61

Comments

122

Joined

2 yr. ago

I've been thinking about this post all day and I still can't figure out what it means. Can you elaborate?

For me the most shocking part is that he's willing to admit Twitter lost so much value. I thought he was still on the "it's finally turning a profit thanks to my brilliant leadership" train.

It just takes practice. I've not overthrown democracy everyday for years.

I think the magic tree house books came with nonfiction pairs. "Jack's notebooks" or something like that. I was crazy for them.

But for me fiction and nonfiction were both mostly at the library, so I wouldn't say the nonfiction books were around more.

Another book

constructive

kuhn-struhk-tiv

helping to improve; promoting further development or advancements

Has being told to come up with higher effort ideas ever helped you to improve your work? It's never helped me, I've only ever been frustrated by it

It may or may not be valid criticism, but it's certainly not constructive. How is OP supposed to change based off your comment? Do you really think they learned something from it?

...but it wasn't constructive?

It does what it claims to do, it's just that what it claims to do is clearly not complete privacy.

2=2

2^2=4

2⁽²2)=2^4=16

2⁽²(2²⁾⁾⁼²(2⁴⁾⁼²16=65,536

TOS is fun to watch in an ironic, cult classic, campy, laughing-at-it-not-with-it way. TNG was the first actually good star trek.

oh, got it. Thanks!

I'm sorry, I must have missed something. Is it not cancelled anymore?

83 with Firefox, uBlock, Privacy Badger and DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials

For anyone else who's curious, it's a google-able question, and closer to 80%

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/26/what-the-2020-electorate-looks-like-by-party-race-and-ethnicity-age-education-and-religion/

Well at least it's not an AI saying it's a boy I guess

Sorry, I meant professional company emails. Obviously people can make up whatever private gmail account they want. And people can state their preferred name, but the fact that if I call my coworker "Josh" and their last name is "Jacobson", the fact that I can type in Josh.Jacobson and find them is extremely helpful, and I don't get why companies would complicate that by making it "jojacko" .

a) well that's fucking terrifying

b) did they really end that with an ad for baby cameras? Or was that a blank ad fill-in-the-blank thing?

I mean yeah, but it happens even more with the naming scheme in the original post. Most companies just add a number when that happens. Predictable naming schemes, at least as the default, make it a lot easier to find people in large companies.