Coca_Cola_but_Commie [he/him] @ Coca_Cola_but_Commie @hexbear.net

Posts

5

Comments

190

Joined

5 yr. ago

Sometimes I think I might have face blindness (not really) because when I saw Alien Covenant I didn't realize that Michael Fassbender plays both the android's David and Walter, the only physical difference between them being that one has dark hair and the other has light hair.

But I was going through a stressful time in my personal life and wasn't giving the movie the trancelike focus I usually give to films.

Still, the twist at the end of the movie was completely lost on me. Can you guess what it is?

Also I can't tell Julia Louis-Dreyfus and Tina Fey apart. There's a clip on 30-Rock where JLD briefly plays Tina Fey's Liz Lemon in a cutaway gag where Liz had cut sugar from her diet. It literally cuts from a medium shot of Tina Fey to a medium shot of JLD in a similar outfit and I can barely tell they're different people.

Saw the new Superman movie, liked it a lot more than I thought I would. A much better film than virtually all of the MCU, and Man of Steel (I never watched Batman vs Superman but based on the clips I think I’m safe in my assumption this is better than those). I liked The Suicide Squad (that’s the James Gunn one) but this is a little better than that. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen it, but my feelings are that this movie is just a bit worse then the second best MCU film, The First Avenger.

Not in the same league as The Batman, which was the best superhero film since 2012’s Dredd (or if you feel like Dredd’s doing a very different sort of thing from the capes then I guess the last good superhero movie was 2009’s Watchmen (yeah, I know, it’s far from a perfect or even good adaptation but I think it’s a decent movie). I guess if you hate Watchmen that much then just go back one more year to 2008, the year of the superhero.)

SHIT I FORGOT ABOUT JOKER. I like both of those movies but I thought about it and decided they don’t count. We’re talking about action/adventure films here which happen to be based on superhero comics, whereas Jokers 1 and 2 are early career Scorsese pastiche that could only secure funding by attaching it to Batman.

There's this self-pubbed Fantasy author who made a very bad critique of a Kojima character named Fatman going around on Twitter. Someone posted the first page of his book, and it's very bad, and for the last day and a half a good portion of my timeline has been relentlessly mocking this.

On the one hand, it seems like this dude has it coming and also the first page of book is very bad. On the other hand, as a wannabe SFF author I am seeing someone live out on of my nightmares. Having this happen to you is like showing up for work and realizing you have to give a presentation you forgot about, and you're naked, and all the teeth fell out of your head.

/c/badposting

Post Title: Neighborhood in Moscow, Russia

Image description: a still image of Barad-dûr from Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Lol, I'm so mad.

Alright so a month ago I installed The Elder Scrolls Online onto my dedicated gaming SSD. Played half an hour of it, haven't touched it since, it's a 110 GB game so I decided to uninstall it to make space for whatever I end up buying in the summer steam sale.

So I decide to use the ESO uninstaller, which is sitting in the top level folder of my drive (I didn't put it there, ESO did when I installed it). I have three folders at this level: Steam, GoG, and ESO. So I click eso_uninstall.exe or whatever it was named and a wizard pops and it works for a second and then I notice my GoG folder disappears, then ESO, then Steam.

At first I thought it was a bug with the windows file explorer, and in a state of disbelief I try to launch a game from steam, which doesn't work.

The fucking ESO uninstaller is apparently programmed to just wipe out whatever folder it is installed in. I google it and this has been a known issue that they just haven't addressed SINCE 2014. Thank god I didn't have it on my main drive, or have anything important on my gaming drive. I haven't lost anything, except 800 GB of games I'll need to redownload. Which with my internet speeds should take about 5 days.

I haven't even really been playing them as of late so it's no real loss, but I was planning on playing some the next couple days. Ah well.

I feel like, roughly coinciding with Mamdani's win last week, my For You page on Twitter is just crawling with reactionary slop. I mean, Twitter always has been, and there was a noticeable uptick when Elon first took over of overtly fash accounts, who neither I nor anyone I follow seemed to interact with in any way, showing up in my feed. But the last week or so I've gotten just a ton of like goofy racist stuff. Maybe I interacted with a few bad posts and the Twitter algo has decided I should be served this content. Or it's possible that when Tucker Carlson was running rings around Ted Cruz that a few of the accounts I liked making fun of Cruz were these right-wingers. Whatever.

In the last half hour I've seen a video where the post said "beware where you get your takeout" and you could see the video was in a kitchen. I figured it was going to be some slighly slop-like content where inspectors go into a kitchen and find roaches or something so I click the video. And it's some British guy who barges into a kitchen and is mad that migrants work there. There was another one of a guy walking through some sort of market in Rome, and he was the only white around, and he was bemoaning the fall of the West. I saw a post from a veteran claiming that Muslims are evil savages, and we can't let Mamdani take New York.

I spend a lot of time doomscrolling Twitter and the sudden proliferation of this stuff (and I'm getting a lot of slop and video content that isn't relevant to me in my feed generally, not just this shit) might be what finally gets me to quit Twitter.

https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PLuKg-WhduhkkEZNV0-1ToOAi_x8pltE22

playlist of all of these bits from Dropout. They're all pretty fun, but this Oreo one is probably my favorite. The hardware store one, where a grandfather is radicalized into anti-capitalism by his annoying crypto-bro grandson is also good.

Zeus expressing his assent for Mamdani?”

Binged the show for the first time a few weeks ago. It's a much better, funnier, and more thoughtful show than its online fanbase led me to expect. It's not a GOOD show, exactly, but it's decent for what it is.

But I feel the show wearing thin in spots. Rick can't change, can't show weakness, can't ever face real consequences because then the show itself would change. He's smarter than everyone, including Q-esque godlike beings. But Morty has come to the realization that Rick is an irredeemable asshole multiple times now. And while Morty has changed, he can't reject Rick fully because then the show would change. They've got to do something to keep this act from getting stale but they also can't do anything.

Similar to House M.D. in some ways, but I'm struck by how that show's various answers to it's unchanging asshole protagonist (his whole staff leaves, he loses both of the best relationships he's ever had, the only person he really cares about hates him for much of the last run of the show, he gets shot, and at least once he does change and isn't such an asshole anymore (but it can't stick)) wouldn't work for Rick & Morty.

In preparation for 28 Years Later I decided to rewatch Days. It’s been probably 15 years since I last saw the film, mostly I remembered Brendan Gleeson and that bit at the beginning of the movie where Cillian Murphy is walking around a deserted London.

I forgot that Christopher Eccleston is in it, and also that in the last act Cillian Murphy, who was just a normal man thrust into the apocalypse, turns into a damn operator. Like fucking Solid Snake. Or if that’s not right (I’ve never played a MGS game) then like Corvo from Dishonored.

Standing up and screaming “Kim Jong Un wife guy!” as loudly as I can in celebratory triumph in the break room.

I’d swear my home town’s homecoming parade gets a better turnout than this.

Can we agree that your most important advisor is indispensable to the realm? That their honor is unimpeachable? That you have the utmost faith in them and their abilities and you know they'd never betray you and seize the crown for themselves?

gaypayoo

If you, like me, were confused why you've seen this image before, this is why:

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/guy-pointing-a-gun-at-elon-musk

I watched that clip on CNN and after saying that Trump accused Elon of having Trump Derangement Syndrome. Extremely funny stuff.

CW: liberal zionism, genocide apologia

https://www.vox.com/politics/414049/reading-books-decline-tiktok-oral-culture

I was reading this article, which is interesting but flawed, about how a group of thinkers believe that society is devolving from a literate culture back into an oral culture (and how that will spell the doom of Liberalism, and herald the return of tyrant kings). The author is ambivalent about that premise while maintaining that the overall decline in literacy is not good and probably a sign of bad things to come. I was even thinking of making a post out of it. But then I got to this bit:

[T]here are several reasons to question the broader premise that declining deep literacy is the driving force behind illiberal politics in America today.

...

Likewise, illiberal leftists — such as those who authored apologias for the October 7 massacre — are not typically distinguished by their lack of literary erudition (and much the same can be said of liberal intellectuals who’ve rationalized Israeli war crimes in Gaza). Nor were the Stalinists of yesteryear especially unacquainted with libraries.

Maybe it's just my personal hatred of the word 'illiberal', but I can't bring myself to engage more with the article, which kind of peters out at the end anyway. The author seems unclear where to point the blame for America's illiberal turn. Is it that nativist hicks are forcing the educated elite out of power? Is it that phones are bad? But what about these stats that indicate phones are good and made us woke about the gays? But how does that fit with the existence of Andrew Tate, the evil man who lives in the phone of every teenage boy? Socrates once condemned writing, so maybe if I say AI is bad somebody will think that makes me look a fucking idiot so I won't say that even though I believe it.

I really was thinking about how I suspect the idea that America was once shaped by an engaged and literate electorate (as was theorized earlier in the article) is misguided, that the US has long taken its cultural cues from the elites, that those elites were once well-educated people engaged in the project of Liberalism, and then once education became for the hoi polloi and Liberalism lost its moral standing to Socialism the elites gave up all pretense of giving a shit sometime around when JFK took one to the dome. I mean there's more to it than that because obviously the views of the masses have mattered and had an effect on things (largely in how the bourgeois respond to those views) but not in the orderly-and-learned-citizens-engaging-in-(non-disruptive)-civic-duty way I feel was implied early on in the article. You could also make an argument that the elites never gave a shit at all, that it was always a farce, that all this is business as usual and the only difference is that now even VOX writers can see that. But the whole thing ends on such a disappointing note and I've got better things to do with my time (I should have been asleep two hours ago), so I'm not going to think any more about this.

Didn’t they already try to bomb a boat that Greta could’ve been on like a month ago?

I watch a bit of Dropout and on one of their shows there was a bit where they had a celebrity judge and they were doing a survivor parody, I think. Can't remember who the celebrity was, I guess it doesn't matter. But Adam Conover was there, sort of randomly because he'd never been in an episode of that particular show before, and I remember thinking it was clear that he was only there because he was friends with the boss and must have wanted a chance to be around the celebrity guest. He just stuck out like a sore thumb because this was one of their improv shows which are entirely built around the actors' rapport with one another, a sizable part of the appeal is that you can tell all the performers and crew are friends who are hanging out, and none of the other performers seemed to know what to do with or say to Adam. I didn't necessarily feel like the other performers disliked Adam or anything, it was just very much the "friend of a friend who you don't know or have anything in common with has come to the get-together and it's making things slightly awkward" vibe.

Also he just wasn't very funny.

I actually kinda like Rogue One but the main thing I remember about the movie is that when they properly introduce the blind monk character, Chirrut Îmwe, it's in the middle of a fight and he shows up to knock out stormtroopers with his walking stick. And at first it's sort of cool, but then it goes on forever, and it starts to feel silly, and you can feel the cracks in the choreography because you start to think "surely one of these guys would just shoot him in the back" and then the character is just there and basically doesn't do or say anything of significance until his death scene. Sort of the problem of the entire movie in microcosm. Lots of interesting ideas for characters that don't get much to do or say. Even the best fleshed out character, Jyn, feels contradictory and ultimately thinly characterized.

As I always say, the novelization is much better.