Buffalox @ Buffalox @lemmy.world

Posts

110

Comments

6,149

Joined

2 yr. ago

WTF? And where is 14 years state law? That's a slippery slope argument.

Except the supreme court is breaking with many decades of legal practice.
I'd argue the current supreme court has been stacked to follow a political agenda over upholding the law. Which makes the supreme court itself illegal in their practice of the law.
Which is why it is insane that Americans have kept allowing this since George Bush! To a point where the system now is completely broken.

Yes

OK that's really enough said.

I was interested in girls my age +/- one year

As are most at that age, except it would have to be +, because if you go minus 1 at 16, it's illegal! But you do not present any real argument only your opinion.

But really that wasn't what I meant at all, what I was referring to was the ability to decide for yourself at the age of 16. Which most countries find you can.

Considering he is above the age of consent it is obviously NOT pedophilia.
If she had been a neighbor it would be legal. The reason it isn't is because she is a figure of authority. Which technically from a legal perspective makes it rape.
In 14 US states it is actually legal!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
Are you really saying 14 states have legalized pedophilia?
Do you even remember how it is to be 16?

My sister has been happily married to her husband who is 15 years older than her for 30+ years, are you saying my brother in law is a pedophile because of the age difference?

You are judgemental and pushing your norms on other people. And it's disgusting you have so many upvotes!

I had decided to resign from this debate, but some of the comments here, like yours are just so far beyond what lawmakers have decided in by far the most countries it's insane. Are you also considering LGBT immoral?

It's wrong yes, but the term pedo should be reserved for when it's justified, which it isn't here.

Considering I linked the info from wikipedia, this must be the stupidest comment in this thread.
Age of a consent is a common thing in all countries, but the age is different.

Safroadu Yeboah-Amankwah, Intel's Chief Strategy Officer will be leaving the company as of today,

I thought the S was for scientific, because technology wise Intel has not been doing well for a long time.
But the S is strategy, and although he was only there for 5 years, Intel sure needs new strategies, because the old ones from when Intel was a near monopoly hasn't worked for more than a decade now, and apparently Safroadu hasn't been able to turn it around.

Time will tell if Lip-Bu Tan's new strategy of trying to build a leaner Intel will work in the long term,

Problem is that recent decisions after Gelsinger don't show much promise, like just making a goal of higher profit margins is not the right kind of goal to set, when your products are not ready for it. There is no vision, and therefore no real goals.

Time is running out for Intel, because TSMC is powering even further ahead, Samsung is still in the game and does not have financial problems, and China is lurking in the shadows. I do not believe being fourth in production in 5-10 years will be a money making position.

X86 is the only thing that is still a money maker for Intel, but desktop use is declining fast, and AMD continues to take server marketshare, and Arm could very likely threaten X86 way more in the future, as Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and other major server players, take control of their own hardware with Arm. And Microsoft is experimenting with Arm for windows to potentially transition laptops first and desktops later, like Apple did.

So in short, righting up the giant tanker in the storm like Intel is in, is far from an easy task, they are caught between a rock and a hard place. Hopefully for them, they can get smarter people than me to manage the task, but as it looks, the people they have on it, are not smart enough.

The article says Mac sales are declining too.
Apparently most of the decline is people that are simply ditching their PC because they don't need it anymore.

But they have not been enforced since Trump became president. And obviously Russia doesn't give a fuck, they are already sanctioned. And Hungary doesn't give a fuck either, they have shown that very clearly, and Orban and Trump are pals, and I'm pretty sure Trump would be very happy to give Orban permission if he asked.

But in the end US sanctions against Russia have been void since Trump became president because they have not been enforced.

It only works if either party gives a shit. But Russia doesn't give a shit about sanctions, if they can find a willing fool to either buy or supply they don't care. Hungary doesn't seem to care either, and that's the reason it doesn't make sense.

Apart from that there are no US threats against anybody dealing with Russia since Trump became president. All American sanctions against Russia have been void for half a year now. Which makes the story make even less sense.

Congress is trying to change that except not really, because they are waiting for the go ahead from Trump, which allegedly he gave yesterday. Or did he? We don't really know, because American politics are all about gas lighting.

Yes it's completely insane, I have no idea how that is legal? AFAIK it clearly isn't legal under the American constitution , where you are considered an American if you are born on US soil. And the base in Germany is AFAIK US soil.

But AFAIK the treatment of everyone is illegal if they don't see a judge before being expelled.
It's absolute insanity, and it's insane Americans are allowing it to happen.

This story sounds very strange, how would American sanctions determine whether Russia can deliver anything to Hungary?
On the other hand EU has strict regulation for nuclear power-plants, which last I heard, Russia does not live up to.
Also it is pretty common knowledge that USA has not enforced sanctions against Russia since Trump became president.
So the whole story lacks details about obvious questions.

Anyways, if this is true, EU must quickly sanction it so EU doesn't buy nuclear tech or any other form of infrastructure from Russia. Why would we work our ass off to stop Russian gas in 2 years, if we allow Russian built nuclear power plants?