Bronzebeard @ Bronzebeard @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

1,078

Joined

8 mo. ago

That used to be a word that meant the bureaucrats who knows how to run things regardless of who was in charge.

It was Republicans who turned it into a conspiracy theory.

Fascists are not conservative. They're extremists and regressive.

They were both there, and thought he was working for the other group

There was one. And it was just a kid who almost accomplished it.

Correct. This is why Disney is now using a sniper of steamboat Willy in it's opening logo - making it part of its trademark

Of the people that were of age, were able, and did vote, just over half voted for Trump, assuming voting tallies were accurate.

False. He didn't even win 50% of the people who did vote for president. He only won a plurality.

A few dozen bomb threats at polling places in the swing states makes it real suspect whether we actually did vote him in.

The party of "family values" was always referring to the value of their labor potential those greedy pieces of shit were longing to utilize.

You're reading way too much into the order I phrased something in, all in an attempt to distract from you being wrong. You keep going further and further off track to distract people. It's not working. Stop it.

The fact that you think this contradicts what I said really speaks to your reading ability.

Profits can become wealth

Is the same as what I said

you end up accumulating wealth

Now go be incorrectly pedantic somewhere else.

That's interesting, as the initial reviews seemed to not like it.

That's the assumption. Many don't. They should have to prove they're doing that charity work like every other nonprofit.

Because those things are related. If you don't spend all your revenue, you end up accumulating wealth - that's profit. Which is directly in contradiction of being a nonprofit entity.

The IRS directly contradicts what you're saying. You can stop pretending you know what you're talking about now.

Lol. I'm so scared, Internet tough guy.

Direct from the IRS website:

Churches (including integrated auxiliaries and conventions or associations of churches) that meet the requirements of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code are automatically considered tax exempt and are not required to apply for and obtain recognition of exempt status from the IRS. Donors are allowed to claim a charitable deduction for donations to a church that meets the section 501(c)(3) requirements even though the church has neither sought nor received IRS recognition that it is tax exempt. In addition, because churches and certain other religious organizations are not required to file an annual return or notice with the IRS, they are not subject to automatic revocation of exemption for failure to file.

Sounds like a rubber stamp to me. They are automatically assumed to be in compliance, and don't have to ever prove it.

So, stop lying.

Many of them ARE. That's the problem.

You chosing to ignore the abusers doesn't mean it's not happening. One would think you would WANT those taking advantage of the system to make the thing you like look bad to be fixed. But here you are defending them

Then fixing the idiotic rules won't make much of a difference...stop defending the abusers

It's because they're not. He didn't even win a majority of people who actually voted, which itself is only roughly half of eligible voters.

So we're looking at a quarter of the population who even bothered to do something to support him, and those actions have since been losing those people as the obvious consequences bite them in the ass

He repeatedly denied supporting Project 2025, and that's exactly what he's been implementing. Start caring

You're the one who's wrong here. All other 501c3 nonprofits have to show their books and prove it. Churches get a rubber stamp.

Stop spreading this lie of yours