I have dozens of accounts. you are jumping to conclusions and attacking the speaker instead of what they are saying. that's ad hominem

they said fight, not hope

when does the candidate become responsible for their own turnout

I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365

votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome

i think 2016 jill stein voters are owed an apology then. and the 2000 nader voters

oh fuck. yeah. no way they should be in an anarchist community anyway.

they are not a safe person. their pattern of "investigating" other users is toxic as fuck.

not too mention their conspiratorial "everyone is a trump supporter in sheep's clothing" accusations every time they find a principaled disagreement.

fuck them.

show me reports I have made.

they are still free to speak, but that community is no longer going to give them a platform

oh no! you found a real anarchist! run!

you can personally object, but all I hear is this

when you are an anarchist, you will get to tell exactly one anarchist what their praxis should be

so you can see by pushing back on advocacy for the ruling hegemony, they are being anarchists

I only vote for criminals. fuck the law

they do care who wins. they want to be the ones to win

wrong

I don't think you know what anarchism is

it's no law at all. it couldn't have been proven, and it can't be disproven either. it's a tautology.

duverger is an undisprovable tautology. it is not a law

the libertarian party punches way above the greens. you're simply wrong.

you speaking about it as though people who would vote for a conservative only have one issue: Conservative candidate. but it's a whole platform, and it's also diverse in its Interests