Australian police shoot dead 'radicalized' teen
Australian police shoot dead 'radicalized' teen
The boy attack stabbed another man in an incident police said had the "hallmarks" of terrorism but was yet to be declared a terrorist act.
The boy attack stabbed another man in an incident police said had the "hallmarks" of terrorism but was yet to be declared a terrorist act.
Western Australia police shot dead a "radicalized" 16-year-old boy on Saturday night after he stabbed a man in Perth.
State Premier Roger Cook said the teenager attacked a man and then "rushed" at police officers, armed with a kitchen knife.
The police responded by shooting him twice with Tasers before firing a single fatal shot.
Why are "hallmarks", "radicalized" and "rushed" all in quotes? I could see an argument for radicalized, but hallmarks of terrorism is pretty standard stuff, and rushing is just a basic English language verb, synonymous with running. Odd to emphasize them as quotes.
15 4 ReplyThey are quotes surrounded by quotation marks.
The newspaper isn't an authority on radicalization, they are quoting a source.
16 2 ReplyThen a lot more should be within quotes. How do they know he was armed with a knife, were they there watching?
6 6 Reply
"attack stabbed". He was really serious
9 2 ReplyThe wording reminded me of Demolition Man
2 0 Reply
Better source from Australia
4 0 Replyan incident police said had the "hallmarks" of terrorism
Because the cops got a tip from a Muslim about a teen who at one point used the internet?
Uhh...?
10 12 ReplyNah, I think it was the part where he stabbed a dude and then rushed at the cops afterwards.
13 3 ReplyNot just stabbed. Attack stabbed.
5 0 ReplyA stabbing is a stabbing. It's not terrorism, and the article provided no evidence of any "radicalization".
Media literacy?
4 1 ReplyI don't know, seems like an unfortunately common health crisis.
But "terrorism" sure gets clicks.
6 4 Reply