It’s essentially another way to treat minorities more fairly
On paper.
In practice, it's more bureaucratic wall papering and cya, intended to obscure industry practices that continue to almost exclusively promote through nepotism and political graft.
Access to government contracts and Senate seats and Ivy League fraternities and Wall Street bank management positions continues to be a White Boys Only club.
It’s basically preferential hiring based on skin color, gender, or sexuality, i.e. affirmative action on steroids.
Meaning you’re not allowed to hire the most competent person for the job, but instead, you have to hire someone based on unchangeable characteristics. In other words, it’s the woke way to be racist and sexist, but it a “good” way (i.e. against straight white males).
What flavor of MAGA kool-aid you be sipping? Let me give you some nutrition.
Before DEI: two candidates, A and B, are equally qualified for a job. Candidate A is a straight white male. Candidate B is woman, person of color, or a member of the LGBTQ+ community. Result: Candidate A will get hired.
With DEI: two candidates, A and B, are equally qualified for a job. Candidate A is a straight white male. Candidate B is woman, person of color, or a member of the LGBTQ+ community. Result: Candidate B might get hired.
Weird, it seems like it was just last month that Boeing literally had a guy murdered for blowing the whistle on rampant DEI hiring practices leading to unacceptable quality problems that directly impacted the safety of their airplanes. Funny how quickly people forget.
"Barnett said he found discarded sharp metal shavings near electrical systems for the flight controls at Boeing’s factory in South Carolina," darn diversity metal shavings!
"Barnett told the BBC that he became aware of faulty installation of the aircraft's oxygen systems, which could deprive some breathing masks of oxygen in the event of an emergency." Darn diverse oxygen systems!
Sauce
Okay, how about putting your sarcasm aside for a second and asking yourself where those metal shavings came from. They didn't just manifest there all by themselves, you know. Someone must have been working nearby, drilling a hole or whatever, and simply forgot to clean up after themselves, because they didn't think it was important.
Now, that COULD have happened to anybody, but when all of SJW Twitter, and even the National Museum of African American History have been informing us for the past five years that things like being competent at your job, having attention to detail, following rules, etc. are all symptoms of whiteness and therefore racist, it paints a certain picture of the most likely candidate, doesn't it?
For all the Newsweek agitprop, it should be noted that "Whiteness" isn't clearly defined. Its a political definition that can include East Indians and exclude Poles and the Irish, depending on who is writing the law.
In a city like NY, with a very long and tawdry record on race politics, it can get confusing for a person wandering through a history exhibit to understand how and why certain ethnic cohorts gain or lose their "White" qualifier. So a museum establishing some kind of historically informed guideline to clarify can be helpful. Particularly when so much of their audience may be themselves or have relatives in their own living history who did not qualify as they do today.
I found it funny that when applying for jobs with the NYC government, Italians were not actually considered white. They were included in the affirmative action policies with other minorities. Definitely shows how the category of whiteness can evolve.
I don't know that it's agitprop, many other outlets reported on this as well and Newsweek's article seems rather matter-of-factly and doesn't really take any sides on this issue. As far as political leaning goes, Newsweek is pretty much right in the center, that's why I chose their article on it, in order to have as little bias as possible.
It only “looks rather likely” from the perspective of a racist. I would look to an explanation that doesn’t require conspiracy theory levels of mental gymnastics.
I saw the maga crowd bitching about woke politics being to blame when the Key Bridge collapsed, but I didn’t think they genuinely believed something so fucking braindead. Apparently I was wrong!
Why don’t you prove your ingenius “women of color saboteurs” theory? Maybe with something a little more substantial then “you don’t know where those metal shavings came from, so it’s probably woke politics.” For all the evidence you’ve presented, those metal shavings may as well have spontaneously generated.
Also if you absolutely insist on keeping up the whole racism thing, you should expect people to be rather curt with you, if not outright hostile. Wild as it is, kind society doesn’t take kindly to racists.
Lmao how fucking retarded do you have to be to think that the quality problems at Boeing are a result of hiring practices? Holy fuck dude don't forget to breathe.
You think Boing airplanes are falling apart because of some women and black people having worked on them?
I want you to know that my 9 year old niece and I are currently laughing at you.
I don't hate myself. I don't even hate you or any of the other people giving my shit. You are merely projecting and you should probably take your own advice.
No, companies ALWAYS want to reduce labor costs, but normally we hate them for it. With DEI, we're giving them a way they can make it socially acceptable.
Uh, IDK, have you spent any time at all on Lemmy? Every day it's company X did this horrible thing, company Y did that horrible thing, capitalism bad, corporations evil. Except when it comes to DEI, then suddenly everyone jumps to defend a megacorporation who seemingly literally just had a guy murdered for trying to speak out about quality control issues that may have lead to actual life-threatening accidents because it might be racist.
Even with DEI practices, white straight males still hold a strong majority of the upper management positions; so whenever you hear about the evils of DEI while indulging in your daily Fox News, Daily Wire, or Newsmax, remember that the buck stops with some white straight males. Hence why blaming DEI for a decrease in quality makes no logical sense.
Most doctors are still straight white males. Most airline pilots are still straight white males. Most of the people who are making major company decisions are still straight white males.
I taught engineering courses for 10 years and have worked in the field longer than that, and I can assure you there is rarely a such thing as a "most competent person for the job." Especially once you get to the highest levels of performance.
I can also assure you that teams which are allowed to stay familiar and homogeneous (eg, a bunch of bros who live together) and are never pushed to include diversity of experience and background rarely achieve anything notable compared to teams who are pushed beyond their cultural comfort zones. Anecdotally, the effect could not be more clear, and there's plenty of peer reviewed literature documenting this.
Tl;Dr - mechanical diversity has intrinsic value. Read a book
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Conservatives have been going hard after diversity programs. They've been banned in state educational institutions in Texas.
I ended up adding a whole section in my course syllabus that's basically a middle finger to the new rules and makes is clear that intolerance is not welcome in my class.
Racist isn’t an insult, it’s an applicable qualifier. You don’t call someone a racist just because you don’t like them. Equating it to name calling makes it look like you don’t even know what the word means.