Campaigners at the Tech Transparency Project in the US found paid-for features for organisations.
Elon Musk's X, formerly Twitter, granted subscription perks to designated terrorist groups and others barred from operating in the US, according to campaigners.
Twitter is burning money and struggling with getting advertisers, and "subscribers" are barely keeping them afloat. Of course they need to accept money where ever it comes from. Why is this a surprise?
That's how a subscription works, people pay money for benefits. Not surprised that X isn't looking into paying accounts since they are short staffed (AFAIK) and low on money. No surprise at all, clickbait title here.
Blue checks can also receive payment based on engagement from other blue checks, though. Doesn't seem to be implied in the article that this happened, but it's a consideration.
They are not terrorists, just utter garbage and waste of organic matter. We should recycle them in factories or something before they start bombing other countries in the name of their delusions. 🧐🧐🧐 /S
I'm an instance admin, and I haven't taken money from anyone to fund my stack (let alone terrorists).
Most Lemmy instances are run by volunteers, many as personal projects. The few big instances typically accept donations and often provide financial summaries (Beehaw definitely does, and I think LW does something similar?)
Sure. The swarm of terrorist sympathizers is well known on these pages. Which is fine, but you can't respond to them without a mod making up an excuse to ban you from a community. You either conform to their thinking or get the hook. They are a powerful lobby. Not the same in other chat boards. Does money change hands? Don't know, but it's as if it does. If you haven't taken money, perhaps some is owed to you.