I'll never understand the way they announce a film's premiere before they even start production. It all smells of the same bullshit corporate mechanism that cancels projects midway or ends up in theaters with subpar visuals and editing that feels rushed, with cookie-cutter action sequences and generic CGI villains.
The difference between
Film as product
and
Film as art
You can have a due date and still be "film as art".
The date might even move around, maybe it gets bumped a week, maybe moved to November, who knows.
Let's look at "Oppenheimer", that came out during the same timeframe as this film is expected to, late July. It started production in early 2022.
Fantastic Four is also starting (or already in) production. Each take a year and a half to be made. Why can't they both be art?
Making a film takes a lot of effort. So it makes sense that they would have a rough idea of how long it would take to make. Especially Disney/Marvel who have made A LOT of movies like this.
Studios schedule out pretty far in advance and every date affects everything else (they don't want their own movies competing with one another). And shooting schedules are affected by those schedules, which means your actors might not be available if you change something. MCU stuff is further complicated by the fact that there's links between the movies.
There's definitely movies that are made on a less strict time frame but you often don't see those put on the schedule until they're complete. So you'll see a long gap between when they're finished and when they're in theaters.
Pedro Pascal is a good actor, but he’s already playing two other “superhero” style roles. You would think they could find someone who isn’t already a part of other franchises.
Also does he seem anything like the role? He plays scrappy underdog turned unwilling but very capable hero well. Does he have a captain America / researcher?
I think a lot of people either forget or didn't watch Wonder Woman 1984, where he plays businessman and snake Maxwell Lord (from the "Life is good, but it can be better" meme).
I'm cautiously optimistic. I think he's got what it takes.
Once released, it will have been 10 years since the last film (which was ok for the first two thirds, then a trash fire), and 20 years since the Fox series which was a very different brand of superhero movie. It was fitting for that era, but wildly different from what superhero movies look like nowadays.
Plus, it isn't like Lord of the Rings where the definitive version has already been made.
The Fantastic Four have a shared starting point, but after that they can go on a variety of different adventures.
yeah... i know "the multiverse" will make it easy to explain away.... but then again ALL Stranges, Wandas, and Antmans looked the same across the verses...
I feel like plenty of multiverses have already done the "sometimes people look the same and sometimes people look different" kinda trope, directly because of the using the same or different actors dilemma.
Honestly I hope not. Or have pre Doom Victor hanging out with Reed in a flashback. But give me Mole Man or something more low scale for the first movie
I doubt they'd drop someone like moleman for fantastic 4, it's more likely they'll throw a newer standalone hero or villain alongside the 4 to establish them easily, like Ironheart in Black Panther 2 or basically half of marvel in fantastic four comics through the 1960s.
Vanessa Kirby you can find in "The Crown" (Season 1 & 2), but also more recently in the newest Mission Impossible films. Not who I would have guessed for Sue Storm, but I think she'll do a great job.
Ebon Moss-Bachrach is going to be great as Ben Grimm. I would suggest watching The Bear and while you're at it Andor (since you're already a Star Wars fan). I'm more excited for him than Pedro, and I really really like Pedro.
Joseph Quinn isn't a name I recognized, but he played Eddie (the DM) on the most recent season on Stranger Things. Which, knowing that, is actually a great choice.
I don't think Disney really understands Fantastic Four. Reed Richards is a monster like Doom. He's a "good" monster but a monster nonetheless. Who would risk their family and friends over and over for their personal scientific glory?
They needed someone like Glenn Howerton to sell the idea of that kind of maniac.
Marvel just needs to fucking stop for about 4 years and let their shitty ass movies cook a bit more. I'm sure this will stink just like all the other crap they've shoveled the past 3 years. Sad because I quite like all the actors they picked for this one.
This year is the break. We only have 1 movie (Deadpool) this year and it was pushed back because of the strike. This is supposed to be the soft reboot leading up to the large reboot of secret wars.
I swear it wasn't even that long ago that the first film came out. I haven't seen the others but there was nothing wrong with the first one. Why can't they just leave things alone instead of rebooting them for the third time in a decade? How do fans of this shit keep track of what is and isn't canon anymore?