RelaGit: First Beta Release now available to download.
RelaGit: First Beta Release now available to download.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3396/c3396544230b23d48c9b0864495dd252a23f4c29" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95f2d/95f2d3c261679866eb92dd211a41b0652f45a44c" alt="RelaGit - RelaGit Beta"
RelaGit: First Beta Release now available to download.
This reminds me a lot of Gitkraken. Vast majority of the time git cli is enough, but for that rare situation when an operation is too complex, the gui was very convenient. Shame they nickel and dime you on everything now
Funny. I have the opposite experience with git. Use GUI for simple tasks and drop to CLI when it's complicated or when something goes wrong.
Same. I mostly use sourcetree to do quick self-reviews and to discard lines or hunks before a commit.
But I've also grown very weary of having to dig people out of git messes they've made with sourcetree and the likes.
Visual clients aren't to blame for that, but they contribute. So many times I've asked "and what git commands did that run?" only to receive a dumb stare as a reply.
Does this help with rebasing? I rarely have a need to rebase but all the same I avoid it because I just don't get it.
How you could somewhat rebase manually (to understand the effect; or because you like to handle the merge conflicts more granular or be more selective):
We assume we have the branch "Feat" which was started on an old version of "Main", and now want to rebase it:
Et viola - you kinda manually rebased "Feat" on "Main"
Not currently but it is planned to be added soon along with in-client conflict resolution.