The call, an apparent imitation or digital manipulation of the president's voice, says, "Voting this Tuesday only enables the Republicans in their quest to elect Donald Trump again."
The call, an apparent imitation or digital manipulation of the president's voice, says, "Voting this Tuesday only enables the Republicans in their quest to elect Donald Trump again."
You’d be surprised. Democrats are already less likely to vote than republicans are. There is a lot of “my vote doesn’t matter so why bother” rhetoric among poor democrats.
This is the sort of crime the feds take seriously. Like you aren’t winding up in uncle Ted’s old cell, but you’re definitely gonna spend some time in front of a judge
Seems like the vast majority of voter fraud crimes surrounding the 2020 election were engineered by Republicans. In my neck of the woods, all three caught voting with dead relatives' ballots were registered as Republican. Two ladies (R) thought they could register as their non-voting kids, and wouldn't have been caught except that the kids decided to vote. The sole Democrat was a guy who provisionally voted while he was still on parole.
Nationally, all the big vote tampering was done by Republicans.
I would hope that if people are voting for Biden that they are smart enough to not fall for these kinds of things. I could definitely see Trump supporters falling for something like this if Donald Trump called them, but I hope that Biden supporters are a little smarter.
It starts... This will be the year to decide if we can have functioning information systems and safe, democratic elections in the emerging age of easy AI manipulation.
It's a bad sign that there are no widely, commercially available free tools (from governments or otherwise) to help us confirm the validity of these things. We likely need something as ubiquitous as "googling" to stand against the incoming avalanche of truly fake information.
There will be elections across the globe this year to truly test humanity. I'm hopeful, but I fear we aren't close to ready. Think about what you would do if you suspected a political manipulation was AI generated today? That's one aspect, and you're on Lemmy so you're likely a bit more capable with technology generally (and you probably still don't know what to do). Now, think about your grandmother in Milwaukee... what will she do?
New Hampshire holds closed primaries, which means Democrats and Republicans can only vote in their own party’s primaries. But independent voters, those who are not affiliated with either party, can vote in either primary — and they make up nearly 40 percent of New Hampshire’s electorate.
Should people stupid enough to fall for this trick be voting anyways?
I mean, I'm sure to get lambasted here on Lemmy for saying such a thing, but regardless of who is running - I think it's a tragedy that we let people who are borderline retarded cast ballots at all. I think that bar should be raised. Most states already have laws regarding mental incompetence but they need to be stronger.
I think it’s a tragedy that we let people who are borderline retarded cast ballots at all.
You deserve to get lambasted for that. That's a horrible thing to say.
The very core of democracy is the idea that individuals have the right to make choices in how they live their lives, and that the power to govern derives from the consent of the government. What you're saying is that there's an arbitrary line of intelligence below which you don't accept someone's ability to consent, and you deny their right to make choices about their lives.
That's already the case. If someone is deemed to be mentally unfit (retarded is NOT a slur it is legitimately a medical term and you people are too sensitive), they cannot vote. It's ALREADY a thing.
To clarify a point I don't think the people replying have specifically pointed out enough already: this line of thinking is contrary to a representative democracy. If some people aren't worthy of voting, then they aren't worthy of being represented by their government (e.g. slaves, felons, children). That's the main disagreement I have with that idea.
If you truly believe there's a measurable line for intelligence/competence below which people shouldn't vote, are you worried there are so many people in that group that it would affect the outcome? If that's true, then don't they deserve representation? This problem is solved if everyone votes. Shouldn't we just try to educate people instead of creating another marginalized group?