Fuck Ubisoft.
Fuck Ubisoft.
I was pretty hyped for the new prince of persia game (the lost crown), but come to find out it's only available on ubisoft's proprietary launcher or epic games. Nope, and nope.
I just want to have it available on my usual storefront, Steam, but it's been decidedly omitted. As a long time fan of the old games, this kind of hurts. Especially since many of the others -are- available on Steam.
I wonder if/when it will come out for Steam. These platform exclusivity deals need to die.
Edit: It's also available on several consoles, my post was just from a pc gamer's perspective.
You're viewing a single thread.
Lol as someone else put it, it's silly to complain that you won't buy a game because it doesn't use the marketplace you want to use.
Steam is just one marketplace and it needs competition. One day it's going to go through enshittification and when that happens you'll be thankful other marketplaces exist.
Sometimes I honestly wonder why PC gamers get so riled up over inconsequential things.
Convenience, the whole reason piracy took a backseat for a few years. Inconvenient? Hit the seas.
I've never found it more convenient to use Steam or another store over piracy so it doesn't make much difference to many.
Some of the games I do own on Steam now don't work either, so it's not like it's an amazing store.
But if it's inconvenient to download a different client just to buy a game then you're just lazy. It's not like you have to subscribe to it, it's just a click and 5 minute wait.
Lazy for not wanting to have 6 different accounts and launchers? Nah. It's easier to just get a pirated version than trying to remember which service you bought what on.
If it's hard work having 6 launchers, it's easier to just get a pirated version period, so might as well just pirate everything.
Not even close... no one is complaining that it's on other stores, the problem is that it isn't on steam and even if there was, it still requires you to install their own garbage client. Quite literally the opposite.
Who cares if it is on Steam or not though?
If everything was on everything then sure, that would be great. But that's not realistic, and having this alternative where everything is on Steam but not elsewhere is not a good solution for that because Steam will be shit one day, and already has quite a few shitty issues.
Honestly, people have this ridiculous view of PC gaming and Steam sometimes. Look around the world and show me where having one company having a massive hold over that sector has ever worked out well long term for consumers.
Man what are you on and whats with these pointless anti steam propaganda. I get why people would be against steam but this literally isn't one of them.
So let me repeat that. NO ONE WANTS IT TO BE STEAM EXCLUSIVE. PEOPLE ARE AGAINST PLATFORM EXCLUSIVITY. To me you look like weird one having some weird fetish for hating big bad companies. Everyone knows the problems of monopoly and I have also taken course on economics so I am somewhat aware of it but I buy things where it's convenient and if it isn't I would rather pirate it. Doesn't matter if it's stream or gog or epic, you are simply barking at the wrong tree mate.
It sounds like we agree then. Ideally everything would be on every platform, but that's unrealistic so OP is pretty much complaining needlessly. It's good there are different platforms and competition.
I tend to agree.
Every storefront is DRM, some better than others, and people shouldn't get so tied to a specific one. PC gaming is so open and getting angry at this is pointless.