Note: For anyone who cares, of course this person doesn't have any evidence at all for this because none of it happen. They are however one of numerous alts of a known transphobe who has been banned from every major instance due to extreme hatred, bigotry, lying, and transphobia themselves.
The comment below demonstrates that /u/Exocrinous is the exact same user as /u/DroneRights. Exo has linked to a post from DR where DR is getting angry at things I did to "them". Yet the things that I did I all did to Exocrinous. So they're openly proving that I'm right in saying that they're an alternate account. If you want to look at reasons for why they were banned, I'd recommend looking up DroneRights in any mod log or just going to their community. They've, in some bizarre fit of insanity, set up a whole community where they repeatedly demonstrate that banning them was the best thing any instance ever could have done.
Oh my god I didn't know DroneRights did their bit outside of Hexbear lmao.
The only thing that drove me more crazy than the "I identify as an attack helicopter" level humor was the fact that the average Hexbearer was credulous enough to entertain it.
My gender identity is not humour. I was never joking when I said what gender I am. You think trans identities are nothing more than a joke because you're a transphobe.
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !dronerights@lemm.ee
It took me a second to realize but you cannot access it through lemmy.world as the creator of that community has been permanently banned from the instance.
If you can link something by them I can reconsider. (Not you, you're in the conversation and we already know your opinion) I've just never heard it used like that.
The word "narc" is a slur, that almost always marks out the user as a self-identifying "victim of narcissistic abuse". It implies a number of incorrect generalizations that have already unfolded quite neatly in this thread. It has definitely become a negative term.
Personally, I would ban all victim lingo. People on "narc abuse" subs use this language to create/enhance their group identity, which is based on a number of incorrect assumptions; "I got really hurt, so my partner is deffo a narcissist", "all people with NPD, or any degree of narcissism are monsters", "self-aware narcissists don't exist", "all of them are abusers", just to mention a few.
We are not allowed to post on those subs. I have never met any of those people, certainly never abused any of them, yet if I post in their space, I will get banned instantly, based on the fact that I have a certain personality disorder. There is a very good reason for that; god forbid that a Narcissistic person genuinely interested in dialogue would burst their bubble, disrupt the story they tell each other.
Yet they are free to post on subs that were created to support Narcissists; free to throw about their negative assumptions, demand explanations for their woes, or downright insult us.
I do not enjoy being a punchbag for "victims", so I would see these discrepancies addressed, and limiting the use of the word "narc" to an appropriate context would be a welcome step in that direction.
That link directs to a post from DroneRights saying that I called them a narcissist to their face. But I said that to you. An account you're insisting isnt an alternate of DroneRights.
Thats a fair point. You never insisted that you were a different person. That makes it insanely easy for me though. Thank you for openly admitting it so I can report this account to the admins of all those other instances and get this account also unilaterally banned for ban evasion.
FYI most people won't even know that NPD is a thing (I didn't until now), and will struggle to empathise with someone apparently being actively hostile. Everyone's a dick on the internet, and that makes everyone think that everyone else is a dick too. Compiling a list of everyone that's wronged you and pointing to it every time they say something will not make you happy and will turn people against you. Everyone (regardless of mental state) needs to realise that arguing on the internet just makes you more frustrated. Remember the old internet rule "don't feed the trolls"; worry about real life people who matter, not faceless usernames who don't.
Not using slurs is a basic precondition to being a good person. My aim is to give people the information needed to make basically ethical decisions, which means not supporting bigots who use slurs. If certain people are too much slaves to their base emotions, and too little capable of simple reasoning, then I am not responsible for the choices they make to fight for the side of hatred.
Even if the N word weren't a slur, you still said I'd been banned from Lemmy instances for having a mental disorder, as if that were a good thing. You used my disorder as an insult.
No, I did not. I said you were banned for being a transphobic bigot. Also I've wasted more than enough time on you and your army of alts.
I have far better things to do than listen to the same person whine in 15 different voices, across three different communities, about how they're so victimized while also outright lying, slandering people and harassing them on top of it.