A WIRED analysis of leaked police documents verifies that a secretive government program is allowing federal, state, and local law enforcement to access phone records of Americans who are not suspected of a crime.
they once searched my car when i was a new driver and i was so nervous about getting rodney kinged. they were so proud when they showed me the empty liquor bottles and a couple .22lr rounds left over from ages. They wanted to charge me with something so bad. it was written across their faces and behaviour. all because of an out of state license plate.
I can't wait until some liberal tells me I should have voted harder for something that is continued endlessly under all forms of politics.
I can't vote harder to a CEO who has no legal requirements to store this data, but does so anyways.
I can't vote harder to the police of my area or state, or the FBI.
I can't vote harder to a president who does not give a shit about any citizens, just "slightly not as racist or as horrible of a rapist, but blue". Especially when "constitutional lawyer" Obama started the DAS, didn't do anything when exposed via Snowden but want him arrested for exposing the truth, and Trump and Biden did nothing.
Sorry to interrupt, but CEOs may have data retention laws to follow, depending on the industry. It's easier for many companies just to save everything, usually. Do they exploit that data? Yeah, unfortunately. CEOs can be blamed for a lot, but not for rules they may have to follow. You can blame them for shitty security over that data they have to retain. That's a thing! (AI companies are the ones you need to look at now as they are the ones that want everything.)
To tweak your point a little, you have no voting power over people who are put in charge of government regulatory bodies who create those data retention rules, for example. (Policy and guidelines are distinct things.)
On second thought, you can vote for the people who control policy or support increased restrictions on police and other feds. You don't have to vote for people who cheer for the abuse of power. You can look at life any way you choose, I suppose.
Your points are not generally wrong and your individual vote rarely changes your country or the world. Addressing complaints of an individual isn't really what voting is for. However, you can vote in different elections for people who have specific areas of control based on your opinion. That is why I got nuanced with my first bit about data, actually.
The people telling you to vote "harder" are simply telling you to actually vote. That is the point.