Does this instance as a whole have a stance on DNP lists, or is it up to each community?
2 comments
Good question, and I've not thought about it previously other than that we would remove content if the original artist requested us to do so. Though, we don't have a formal list of DNP content, we just expect that users post content they're permitted to or that is already otherwise shared on other sites (like e621).
I'm not against a DNP list, but I think I'd lean more towards respecting an existing DNP like https://e621.net/wiki_pages/85. Though, if we did end up getting to the point of having a lot of DNPs that don't appear on their list, we'd probably move to making our own.
I'll bring this up to the rest of the team too for feedback!
The reason I ask is there have been a few posts recently of artists with a DNP request on their page, or on 621s DNP list already.
Good question, and I've not thought about it previously other than that we would remove content if the original artist requested us to do so. Though, we don't have a formal list of DNP content, we just expect that users post content they're permitted to or that is already otherwise shared on other sites (like e621).
I'm not against a DNP list, but I think I'd lean more towards respecting an existing DNP like https://e621.net/wiki_pages/85. Though, if we did end up getting to the point of having a lot of DNPs that don't appear on their list, we'd probably move to making our own.
I'll bring this up to the rest of the team too for feedback!
The reason I ask is there have been a few posts recently of artists with a DNP request on their page, or on 621s DNP list already.