US anger should be directed at Putin, not Ukraine, Macron says after deadly Russian strike on Kyiv
US anger should be directed at Putin, not Ukraine, Macron says after deadly Russian strike on Kyiv
Agreed. Nobody appeases the Russians like bitch ass Republicans.
US anger should be directed at the blyats, including trump.
Trumps rage isn't that of America, he is all ruZZian. All day everyday Agent K.
He is Agent Orange, he is toxic.
Today in “DUH”: blame the aggressor for the war they started.
If the US truly wanted to get russia to negotiate, they would understand that the best option is a massive ballistic strike on Moscow (government/military/R&D facilities, but also key bridges and admin centres). And this would have to be done on a regular basis.
But the Americans (not only Trump) lack balls and are too ignorant to be able to negotiate with the russians.
Why would trump, a russian asset do any of the above? He really only has one real goal and it's not in Ukraine's best interest. Hell, it's not even the US's best interest. trump only serves himself and his interests align with putin.
I am talking about American approaches to russia in general.
From my understanding (I have several friends from the US and I used to live in North America), the public (even pro-Ukraine Americans) largely doesn't understand how to deal with russians.
You have to treat them more like the Islamic state (a strong majority of russians are genocidal imperialists and many of the remainder are merely avid imperialists, albeit without open genocidal intent). You can't buy into their threats. You have understand their psyche and not buy into their fear mongering.
Russia has nuclear bombs that can reach the US. While they have a lot of "red lines" that have turned out not to be, it seems likely that hitting Moscow would be a real red line and the end the world.
Europe has the same ability to strike Russia that way, they don't for similar reasons.
Thank you for proving my point. The "end of the world" phrase was the cherry on top.
Believe it or not, I have a measure of understanding of American attitudes, both from living in the US and having American who friends with views across the spectrum on this issue.
A large ballistic strike on Moscow and SPB (at least 50 rockets, if not more) is exactly how you show the russians that you mean business.
At this point, westerners typically use "you're being emotional/unreasonable" or "I don't want nuclear war" type excuses.
This is all BS. Do you speak russian? Do you speak any other "local" languages? Have you ever lived in russia? Where? Can you provide 3 key bullet points for every decade of the 20th century w.r.t russian empire/USSR/modern Russia?
If you had any real knowledge of russian history you would see how your "end of the world" rhetoric isn't backed by reality (I am not just referring to 1962, other factors are important too).
P.S. You do understand that Ukraine regularly hits Moscow and has even hit the Kremlin?
Krasnov is as Krasnov does.
Trump is high on chlorinated chicken and chemical detergent dipped eggs.
The way Trump politely asked Vladimir not to do this makes me think it's planned.
It's too show that Ukraine is fucked without US stuur defence.
Surveys still say more Americans are sympathetic to Ukraine.
yeah but they're too detatched to reality to know in a binary choice election what to do. even now, with all the cards face up on the table, they're asking the floor boss what the rules of texas holdem are and if they won the pot while the oligarchs sit there with three aces of spades in their pocket and somehow have played a 5 of a kind flush
Wow. That's a neat trick, talking out of your ass.
Someting about freedom fries and 5g cancer plus this...
https://www.newsguardrealitycheck.com/p/misinformation-survey-false-claims?r=1btnlx
The fact that this has to be stated truly disgusts me.