What does one do with a settler population if their mother country won't take them back?
What does one do with a settler population if their mother country won't take them back?
This is something I've wondered about but never really seen an official leftist position on, and it's gotten a lot more relevant with the ongoing Palestinian uprising. Also curious if there is any good reading out there on this subject.
You're viewing a single thread.
After starting the new state, unequal rights aiming for the material development of the historically oppressed. Considering that real life colonialism is being coordinated by capital, that would mostly just mean good ol' dictatorship of the proletariat.
Edit: to be more clear, regarding your question, the settlers would be integrated, but their violence and plunging would be directly countered by state forces. Their workforce and whatever they developed during their terror wold be used by the state for the development of the (now collectively owned) means of production and the work force (education, better food etc.)
As someone who's been priced out of the housing market and property ownership, it's fun arguing with libs about landback. They can't appeal to my sense of fairness (thieves don't deserve to keep their stolen goods) and they can't appeal to my selfishness.
Permanently Deleted
Counterpoint: The capitalists are thieves who steal our surplus value
Permanently Deleted