This graph is terrible, since it gives no scale. A person with no knowledge beforehand wouldn't know if that's a 0.1 degree shift or a 20 degree shift.
Around here, it hasn't gotten above 100 in many years, so people like to point at that to say nothing has changed.
Never mind the fact that spring is starting earlier and earlier, dropping shitloads more rain than normal, and it's October and people still have A/C on...
For those confused a histogram is meant to give you an idea of the "shape" of data. It does this by mapping frequency of data points. That said I'm not a scientist and I'm also not use to seeing them without any values like this
Only when people paying attention to an issue are completely sick of seeing the same message again and again does it start to sink in with the general public. So a lot.
This is one hill we'll have to drag the deniers over kicking and screaming. I doubt they will ever come around, even as the weather gets to the point of melting their face.
People don't give a shit and they're never going to until it's far too late to do anything about it. Hell, we're probably already there and still no one who matters gives a shit.
Is it me or is the NYT schizo? I never thought it was my imagination because I work outside.
It’s a lot of you dumb as shit INSIDE workers that we can’t stand, fumbling about the climate like a bunch of republicans trying to figure out who’s next at the billionaires gangbang.
im an inside worker and notice. im over 50 though but man the typical for before 1990 compared to the typical after 2000 is so massive. Its like I moved south.