Why The Economist endorses Kamala Harris
Why The Economist endorses Kamala Harris
The latest news in US politics, with coverage of President Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the Democrats, Donald Trump and the Republicans plus daily updates about the 2024 US election.
You're viewing part of a thread.
Who said anything about no vote?
"I will never, ever, EVER explicitly make a claim for a course of action, because then you'll be able to refute my decision as stupid.
Instead I just want to hold my nose in the air over all of you sheeple and criticize and shame you for EVERY action, shaking my head and smirking like some kind of disingenous gaslighting machine. Happy Election Day!"
Okay then, who should Hoosiers vote for? You said no one should vote for Harris.
That leaves Trump, Oliver and Kennedy.
Which of those three should no one vote for as well? Let's do a process of elimination here and take it step by step.
I assume Kennedy is not an option here since he dropped out already, but he's still on the ballot. Obviously, that's essentially not voting and you're suggesting that not voting is not a good choice.
So, that leaves Trump, the Republican and Oliver, the Libertarian.
Should no one vote for Trump?
No one should vote for Trump either. They are both garbage legislating for the benefit of the wealthy
Okay, so you think Hoosiers should vote for Oliver, the Libertarian? Because that's the only other option.
I know nothing about him, if he's anything like other libertarians he's garbage until proven otherwise
Well then we're back to not voting. Which you said not to do. You don't seem to have thought this through.