"Police believe multiple suspects arrived at the location in a vehicle. The suspects exited the vehicle and fired multiple shots at a group of people who were on the sidewalk of Magnolia Avenue before getting back in their vehicle and fleeing the scene.
Detectives believe the shooting was not random and stemmed from an isolated incident where multiple victims were caught in the crossfire.
In a new conference Sunday morning, Birmingham Police Chief Scott Thurmond says he believes someone was paid to kill the targeted victim, and they believe that victim is among those who died.
Police confirmed the weapons used were fully automatic. More than 100 shell casings were found at the scene, according to Chief Thurmond."
And yet, the top comments are already reposting the same garbage.
I love how people always make it sound like we're one law away from solving all gun violence. We have 393 million guns in the hands of civilians in the US. That's more guns than people.
Guns make much of our violence worse here, sure, but pandora's box can't be closed. New laws limiting guns are often a very good idea, but distilling our problems with violence down to "guns bad, Americans so stupid" is asinine and endlessly tiresome.
Dumb and propagandized people are the plague, guns violence is the symptom. But yeah, it is easier to get rid of the guns, because it is hard as fuck to educate those people because they don't listen.
I read Birmingham and for a second thought this might not be in the US, oh how foolish I am.
I used to think that gun laws/ownership in the US was workable, I know lots of responsible gun owners, and have shot a couple guns myself. But I'm just tired of all these mass shootings, at this point maybe we should just get rid of them.
The science is pretty clear; gun control works. Every time you repeal gun control laws, loosen restrictions, open gun stores, gun-related deaths escalate, often dramatically. States with higher gun ownership rates have higher rates of homicides caused by guns. Even a 1% reduction in gun related deaths would be the equivalent of 2,500 people per year. Kids die more often from gun-related deaths than car-related deaths.
Mass shootings also barely make up 1% of gun-related deaths, so the science behind them isn’t as well studied, but things like reducing magazine sizes shows a correlated relation in reduction of mass shootings.
Ah but the problem is defining an illegally owned gun.
I could go buy a gun from some dude on the street, or at a gun show and that's... perfectly legal. The (federal) law right now is basically 'you can sell a gun to someone in your state, as long as you don't have good evidence they're going to go shoot someone'.
Which, you know, you simply do not ask them.
So as to the guns being owned illegally... maybe, maybe not: it's not hard to own a gun legally even though the rest of the planet is now recoiling in horror about what that term actually means.
The Glock switches are for sure federally illegal, but getting the ATF to do anything other than smuggle guns into Mexico is probably impossible given how fucked up they are. And I mean, they're 3d-printed, so how do you even reasonably enforce that?
You're probably right, but guns like the ones they used can be obtained legally making them much easier to be obtained illegally. I'm not an expert on gun policy, so I can't tell you how we should restrict access to guns.
Ignoring the baseless speculation on whether these are legal guns or illegal guns, since there is a pretty good spread on that spectrum:
The importance is having fewer guns overall. If the availability of legal guns is drastically reduced then it will be a lot harder for an ar-15 to fall off the back of a truck or go missing in someone's home. It won't happen overnight but it will happen pretty quickly. We have seen this happen in other "Western" nations.
Personally? I don't want to infringe on the rights of responsible gun owners. If anything, I want to make them even more responsible. What that means is that I want:
Much stricter background checks on buying firearms. By all means, factor therapy and rehabilitation into that (just because someone had a nervous breakdown in high school shouldn't impact their ability to own a people killer so long as an accredited mental health professional signed off on it. But no "gun show loopholes" and more "cooling off periods" to ensure that NOBODY can buy a gun same day.
Ammunition is a controlled substance. You want to buy a box of 9mm rounds? Cool, you are going to fill out a form to make sure that is tracked and you are going to be limited to a certain number of rounds per year unless you fill out the proper forms to get more (comparable to how suppressors and SBRs are handled). And, again, cooling off period. You fill out the form and a week later you can buy your bullets.
Liability on firearms. If your gun is used in a crime then you are charged for it, regardless of whether you pulled the trigger or not. You can bet that people will be disposing of their twenty kitchen cabinet guns almost immediately once they realize they are liable for Little Timmy shooting up his school. And if a gun goes missing? You can bet they will report that within minutes of finding out (and will be checking those gun safes semi-regularly as a result).
Liability on sellers. If a gun is used in a crime then ALL the above paperwork will be triple checked and any improper procedures will result in the seller losing their license or even being charged with negligence.
All these giant piles of "illegal guns" will dry up pretty quick (comparable to a civilized nation where they are fairly rare for criminals to use) and all the guns that kids take to school will similarly actually be locked up in a way that Little Timmy doesn't have unsupervised access to.
But all those Responsible Gun Owners(TM)? They won't be affected because clearly they are already securing their firearms when not actively in use and always know where their collection is and are making sure that only people who are also Responsible Gun Owners(TM) have access to it.
Hell, as a treat, let's let people who own public shooting ranges jump through some more hoops to relax some of that. You need 500 rounds of .223 a day to practice shooting? Buy it by the mag at Herman's Military Antiques and use it at his range. You can't take it home with you but you never needed to take it home to practice shooting, right?
This is who we are, and the world should judge us accordingly for our unrepentant murderous barbarism thinly masked as "freedumb."
Don't worry my fellow Americans, our only practiced cultural value, greed, won't be injured by the latest mass shooting, it makes private gun manufacturer stocks go up, which is of course the meaning of existence.