"Nintendo may be reaching" in its Palworld lawsuit, according to a lawyer who says it's "hard to imagine what patents" the survival game could have infringed upon

www.gamesradar.com

17 comments

I hate all patents but game mechanic patents are some of the silliest patents there are
- The silliest part is the game ripped off more mechanically from Breath of the Wild than Pokémon
  
  Their previous game, Craftopia, which I've actually played unlike Palworld, ripped off even more from botw but it was still a very different game. Kinda felt like it was trying to be every possible type of game at once.
Patents are the reason we don't have mini games during loading screens. The patent is now expired afaik but I guess we just collectively decided we don't care because nobody does it anymore.
If Nintendo can get a court to side with them, then it is totally worth it for them to own an entire genre. As a consumer/gamer, this sucks. There is a reason this game blew up and it has nothing to do with Nintendo.
- Ssds are now common place so loading screens aren't as long
Me thinking about patents and the nemesis system
Patents are abused all the time. Here's a banger from Apple https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/7/3614506/apple-patents-rectangle-with-rounded-corners
I look forward to the inevitable Moon Channel video
Who cares at this point? Palworld was the definition flash in the pan. It was fun don't get me wrong, but I am not clamoring to go back any time soon.
- It's a big deal because this is a patent lawsuit, not a copyright infringement suit. Nintendo isn't accusing Palworld of breaching Pokémon aesthetically or whatever. They are accusing Palworld of breaching their patent of a gameplay mechanic.
  
  The gameplay mechanic of... Turn based RPGs?
Even if this guy isn't the actual lawyer for the case, he's literally still a lawyer, he's not supposed to be imagining shit, his job is to read and reference.
Also weird that he would reference that Pokemon and Palworld are "such different games" if the actual patents in questions aren't known and if Nintendo have not named Pokemon as the game/franchise that contains the infringed patents.
The Pokemon connection just seems to be a conclusion people reached because of external similarities, but Nintendo could just be like naming a Zelda or Mario patent too, whatever they think might stick far enough to scare the Palworld lawyers.
I have to imagine that Nintendo would have listed the infringed patents in their lawsuit. You don't have to imagine anything
nintendo shouldn't be allowed to sue anyone. I should be allowed to sue the developers of unfunny streambait games that look like shit that i have to hear about for a month.
- I am announcing a $5 billion lawsuit against Scott Cawthorn over me having to hear countless people say “Do the Freddie Fazbear!”
People are saying the pokeballs are the thing

17 comments