California woman fed up with stolen mail sends Apple AirTag to herself to catch thief
California woman fed up with stolen mail sends Apple AirTag to herself to catch thief
A California woman tired of packages being stolen from her post office mailbox mailed herself an Apple AirTag to track the thieves.
A Southern California woman fed up with her packages getting stolen out of her post office box sent an Apple AirTag to the address and cleverly tracked down the suspected thief, police said.
The woman had had several items stolen from her mailbox at the Los Alamos Post Office already when she thought of the idea, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office said Tuesday. Apple’s $29 AirTags have become popular items since their 2021 release, helping users keep tabs on the location of anything from their lost keys to wallets and luggage.
On Monday morning, sheriff’s deputies were called to the post office where the woman told officials her mail had been stolen again — including the package with the AirTag.
You're viewing a single thread.
The sheriff’s department commended the mail theft victim for contacting law enforcement so they could apprehend the suspects rather than attempting to contact them on her own.
They should have been congratulating her because she did their job for them.
I'm just glad they did something about it.
Some police departments won't even be bothered to do anything about petty theft even if you give them a name, picture and address of the perpetrator.
Isn't interference with mail a fairly hefty offense over there?
Yeah it's a federal offense. That said cops can be lazy as shit and usually won't bother to help unless you're someone who's important to them.
USPS does NOT fuck around with mail crimes. Reporting it to them means they'll bring the hammer down.
Yep I had a USPS worker sign on a signature required package, had it on video.
Pretty sure he was fired because he fucked around and found out on a package I specifically requested to be signed required.
If it’s US Mail then contact the US Postal Inspection Service. They’re federal law enforcement specifically for the USPS, and they don’t fuck around.
Sure, maybe they don’t fuck around, but they also aren’t funded so they don’t do jack shit for you. Thanks DeJoy and Republicans.
Local police also aren't generally the best to contact over federal offenses. If it's not immediately actionable, they tend to lose interest and just shove the paperwork onto the "when we get around to it" pile
Came to say exactly this. Lots of articles about police doing fuckall when trackers show the location of stolen property.
In cases like this also contact the US Postal Inspection Service. They won’t take kindly to stolen mail, especially if it’s stolen right out of a US Post Office.
especially if it’s stolen right out of a US Post Office.
For those who aren't aware, your mailbox is considered property of the USPS for exactly this reason. Only the people who receive mail there (and the USPS) are allowed to use it.
I've also seen the opposite where they'll raid the wrong house because the tracker isn't as accurate as it needs to be in some cases. Police seem to always take things to the extremes rather than taking a more measured approach.
In regards to mail theft, that's usually because it's outside of their purview; The USPS has its own dedicated police force that you should contact instead. If any part of your shipment was run through USPS, (it probably was, because FedEx and UPS both contract out a bunch of stuff to USPS), then they'll investigate it as if it had been stolen directly from the USPS. And those investigators do not fuck around. Calling your local cops will be met with apathy, because there's an entire federal department that could be dealing with it instead.
Law enforcement budgets are tight. 30 dollars is too much when they have to buy military equipment instead.
Oh they're given the military equipment. But the new cruisers they buy and then the cost to paint and modify them to win the Best Looking Cruiser Competition is pretty high.
Nah, they still have to buy the milsurp, it's just so cheap it's "an offer you can't refuse".
I don't need a black powder cannon, but if you offered me one for $100, I'd be reaching for my wallet.
A friend of mine had his phone snatched on the bus, so he had me call his phone and pretend to be the phone company, telling the thief that he'd won a new phone and I just needed his address.
The police were very happy that we'd done their job for them, and they got his phone back.
LOOOL. Something similarly stupid happened to a friend of mine. His phone got stolen in a nightclub but it was a rather unusual phone. He saw it for sale a few days later on our equivalent of craigslist and offered to buy it. Thing is the guy was a professional fighter and he turned up with a good friend who was a bouncer and also fought out of the same club.
Anyway....The person selling it was the bouncer from the club it had been stolen from. Someone would go around robbing phones from the club then sell them to the bouncer at a hefty discount and he would then sell them on. He apologised profusely and tried to explain his way out of it yada yada.
Friend got his phone back anyway.
Honest question, are there any reasons why a private citizen performing this sort of thing would be legally less of a problem than the state?
From a philosphical perspective I'm all for catching mail thieves. But I would get a little twitchy hearing that the police are mailing tracking devices. And I would be more or less ok with a private citizen helping to "catch the bad guy" with their security camera, but I do not want police surveillance cameras on my street, thank you very much.
We had a possible breakin on my street, and police noticed my doorbell camera. They politely asked if I could check whether it picked something up, and I showed him a picture possibility (complainants said oh yeah that was us).
I was ok with it because it was a request, the cam only shows public areas, and it never left my control. I don’t know what would have happened if it went anywhere, but I could have said no, and I could have said nothing was picked up. This was all reasonable cooperation with no overreach or privacy invasion
but I could have said no, and I could have said nothing was picked up. This was all reasonable cooperation with no overreach or privacy invasion
For what it's worth, Ring and Nest both got some bad press, because it was discovered that police were issuing warrants for footage directly from the companies. Many of the people never even knew their footage had been pulled and used by police. If you're self-hosting a video server, then cool. But if you're using one of the big companies, they didn't even need to ask you first. And even if you're self-hosting, they could technically compel you to turn over the footage if they can convince a judge it will help their case.
Yeah, I did give that some thought but decided I was ok with it since it can only see public areas.
I do have a cam inside, facing by the door, for another chance to see if someone is coming in, and do NOT use cloud storage for that. I only have a USB stick for that until I do set up a video server
Na, they were too busy being pisssed of they couldn't just say "nothing we can do, there's no way to track the thief down" and walk away like usual.