ACAB includes Kamala Harris

Honestly don't think either one would give 2 shits about a gram of weed.

Also batman's a billionaire. That's worse than being a cop.

Edit: LOL are you just banning anyone that finds your meme shitty? Fragile.

I've banned people for violating multiple of our community guidelines, not for disliking or criticizing my post.
- Okay, I call shenanigans.
  Some of those comments are still visible, and I find your claim that they violated C/ rules a stretch at best.
  I would hope that you either clarify your rules so that it is much less likely to happen in the future, or that you reevaluate the decisions.
  The worst of the ones still visible to me would require a great deal of hypersensitivity and a nigh maniacal definition of any of the rules as they existed when I just went to look at them. Now, removing those comments, that would make sense. Warning the people that made them, makes total sense, but it would be better to build up the listing of the rules to include some examples, or you'd end up warning more people over time doing it piecemeal like that.
  But bans? I hate to break it to you, but I used to be known for being a harsh mod I'm some ways, and none of those comments merit bans with the rules as they're currently written.
  But, hey, it's your C/, do what you want. If you want to exclude any and all dissent, that's your choice. Just don't be surprised when the C/ ends up as an echo chamber with little to no activity.

Just want the snowflake mod to know that I’ve blocked this community because of his truly pathetic display.

I wonder how long ago I spelled Kamala wrong to get my autocorrect thinking it's correct with an "e" lol. Thanks

Some of the earliest Batman comics were about him beating up bootleggers. He also fought a villain who's goal was supplying cheap and safe pot.

He used to shoot people too in his earliest iterations.

Oh, nooo, a democratic politician is not gonna bring on a literal liberalsocialist utopia?! That's basically just like letting a literal faschist win! No difference at aaall!

Ow!

Why am I-ow!

Please, Mr. Mod, sto-ow!

Stop beating me with the anarcho-cop dild-ow!

Why am I being ban-ow?

is driven away in anarcho-mod-ist partolling vehicle

Notice yours and the other comments critical of me still up? I'm not banning anyone or even removing comments for being critical of me or this post.
I'm removing comments supportive of the US so-called justice system or being uncivil and rude in a way not condusive to nuanced political discussion.
I've temp-banned three accounts for calling me a Russian bot. That action my be too harsh for a first offence, and I'm open to discussion about that. However, that type of rhetoric has absolutely no place here.
Discussion about the moderation of this community is absolutely allowed, and as long as it doesn't degrade to throwing insults, it will all remain up.
- I've really thought about whether I even want to engage with this. Mostly because I see your comment as dishonest, misinformed or maybe just tone deaf; to voice the kindest interpretation I can muster, from what I have seen.
  Here's the deal: The US is currently at a point where its already fragile and lackluster democracy could become completely meaningless within a matter of months.
  There's a time to push for more. But not now. You banned people and deleted their comment for "electioneering"; for advocating for the best path forward currently available. You may not like the system or the dems, but there just isn't any momentum for anything else. That has to be built up first.
  If you want to bitch and moan, feel free to do so after the immediate threat has been dealt with. Anything else is practically accelerationism and will lead to a terrible outcome and disenfranchise who knows how many people.
  Bargain with what you have and don't overextend.
  EDIT: I'll not engage with anything that doesn't also offer a practical, actionable solution. Striving for the best is great, but look around you. Abolishing the police is not on the table, and not voting because of a single issue is shooting at ones own foot.
  EDIT #2: Words.

I mean, sure, but also weird timing.

I don't find the timing weird at all with all the bootlicking I've seen from the wider fediverse lately.
- People can change for the better, and Harris has changed her stance on weed.
  Would I rather have a few other folks who were always on the right side of history? Yes.
  Is someone who has improved on critical issues acceptable? Also yes.

It's so weird how critizing the lesser evil ticks people off!

Be critical of all authority, especially when they still stand by genocidal maniacs 😮‍💨

Batman.

I would just casually mention how his dead parents are dead and then steal his utility belt as he cries on the floor.

Also one of the tools in the belt has got to be an unlimited corporate credit card - just to flex on the guy I would lower the crime rate in Gotham by using the card to buy things for the homeless, pay for education & medical bills for everyone in Gotham, etc.

Batman does that already. Hes runs the largest charity on earth:
The Wayne Foundation is the holding company for the Thomas Wayne Foundation and the Martha Wayne Foundation; it is the largest transparently operated private foundation within the DC Universe. The primary aims of the foundation are, globally, the arts and humanities: to enhance healthcare and reduce extreme poverty, to expand educational opportunities and access to information technology, and to fund scientific research and help altruistic people with research by providing facilities and training.
The foundation has its own building, called the Wayne Foundation Building, which includes a penthouse where Bruce Wayne lived for a period of time. It also has a secret elevator that leads to a matching Batcave in a secret sub-basement under the building.
Through the Wayne Foundation and the affiliated organizations underneath, Bruce Wayne addresses social-economic problems encouraging crime, assists victims of crimes, and maintains connections to the streets through the soup kitchens and social services groups; all of which augments his crime fighting efforts in a way that his Batman persona cannot. This arrangement also provides a large network of connections in the world of charities. He finds out about the newest trends, sciences and the arts.
Thomas Wayne Foundation
The Thomas Wayne Foundation is a foundation for medicine and medical help. This foundation gives annual awards for medical breakthroughs and lifelong commitment, similar to the Nobel Foundation. The Thomas Wayne Foundation is also responsible for funding the Thomas Wayne Memorial Clinic in Park Row, Gotham's infamous Crime Alley. The foundation funds and runs dozens of clinics in Gotham. Bruce Wayne's surrogate mother, Dr. Leslie Thompkins, runs the Memorial Clinic in Crime Alley and governed the other clinics until she left Gotham.
Martha Wayne Foundation
The Martha Wayne Foundation is a patron and supporter of arts, families, education, and tolerance. The foundation supports and helps to run a number of orphanages and free schools, and provides teachers for those who have learning difficulties. Artists can apply for grants from the foundation to help support them in furthering the arts. The foundation sponsors companies like Family Finders. Family Finders is an organization directed at finding lost people and uniting families. The Martha Wayne Foundation also sponsors and runs dozens of soup kitchens within the city.
- Yes, I knew this reply was inevitable, but I was mostly making a joke.
  Mostly, bcs sure various authors added (contemporary) bits and pieces about how Billionaireman helps too, but that also doesn't fit in with what Gotham is. Can't have both. Or just have him be middle class with still money for toys.
  What Im saying for example is he could easily buy whole neighbourhoods & rent them for free, this is something with permanent effect that would start a movement. Adding schools, stores, one of his banks, etc would make the henchman market pretty tight. Actually there are a lot of comedic opportunities in that narrative.
  Anyway, for my headcanon I kinda decided that all regular violent crime in Gotham is just the immediate doing of some masked and themed villain. So there arent any (constant) street muggings etc. So Batcostumeman doesn't 'patrol the streets' bcs there isn't such crime to patrol for.
- He's fucking bad at it, but that's the problem with comic universes with alien technology and super genuises running around, poverty should be eliminated but that just leaves all the mortal superheroes with nothing to do.
  I actually quite like the Patterson Batman's take on the Wayne Family philanthropy. Yes, they gave billions to charity, but lost most of it to corruption when his parents were killed and it was in trust...
  Or was that his father's real goal all along?
- I guess there are just some problems that cartoonish wealth disparity can't solve, in DC or in RL.

Me: Kamala may be a democrat but they are still a conservative candidate
Lemmy: [ Sound of a kindergarten class after someone loudly farts ]

.world libs mad at the cognitive dissonance they feel knowing the "lesser evil" chosen for them has ruined lives for minor drug offenses.

I'm from Oakland, she also gave people the opportunity to not face jail time with the Back on Track program, instead allowing for education.
Here's the thing, Back on Track had people accept a felony charge. If they complete the program (which gives them no jail time but resources) then the felony is expunged.
Her truancy laws put in place as Attorney General were clearly pointed at my community, yes. But it also was done because before my graduating class (the year before it was put in place) was below 50%. My class was brought up to 78%, and the year after was about 68%. The reason this law was even considered was because there were a significant portion of children working with gangs to sell drugs instead of getting their education.
Give her all the shit you want for her problems, I 100% agree. However it's only fair to also highlight the actual policy she put into place and the opportunity for change that she created. I do not think it was the best way of moving forward, as it encourages people to be arrested and it encourages them to take the felony charge for something undeserving. At the same time, it's clearly better than just allowing children to participate in gang life and giving people only 1 option, imprisonment. No one ever seems to want to talk about that, though.
She fought against the Death Penalty when everyone was pushing for it for a cop killer. Not only did she save his life, she did so against Diane Feinnstein who then said she would not have supported Kamala had she known this.
She has been one of the few people who is willing to stick to her convictions when other party members told her to stay in line. She's also extremely anti-fracking, something that seems important considering the amount of sway oil companies have with L.E. and the military.
Finally, regarding your comment - I remember throughout 2016 and the following years the amount of assaults that Trump supporters felt completely safe committing hate crimes against black and asian communities. Is it really people choosing the lesser evil? The police can get reform, in fact we have a whole bill that AOC is pushing for right now regarding this.
Hate crime promoted by the president does not.
- Thanks for the well written and thoughtful response. I appreciate your insights and personal experience.
  I will say that this is not a space that's friendly to defending liberalism (even so called progressive liberals like Harris or AOC) or the use of state violence to solve any of society's problems.
  With your comment in mind, and not out of any respect for electoral politics, I'll try to be more thoughtful with my criticisms in the future.

Locking this post because it's been plagued with liberal apologia from the start. This community does not exist to debate the merits of liberalism. Quite the opposite, it's intended to be a safe space from liberals constantly making us defend our views.

I'm afraid I've failed to achieve that in this thread, and have left up and engaged with too much liberal apologia already.

There has been some good discussion here even through all the muck. I apologize if I've cut off any good faith discussion.

To all the libs salty about having comments removed - you can debate the merits of your oppressors elsewhere. It won't be tolerated here.