Assassin's Creed
Assassin's Creed
I would gladly pay good money for re-released AC games without any of the modern day Abstergo stuff. Am I the only one? I mean, at the time it was interesting, but the modern day missions now just detract from immersion and are usually crap.
Just me or anyone else?
[Just started replaying Revelations!]
You're viewing a single thread.
I'm the exact opposite.
The thing that got me excited to keep playing back when I first started the series was the idea of the modern-day plot building to an awesome conclusion. I first got into the franchise after Revelations was released, but before 3 was, and played through all of those games pretty quickly. When 3 came out, I heard that they had killed off Desmond, and I immediately noped out. Never bought 3, haven't played an AC game since. I quote a comment I saw over a decade ago back on the alien site:
What I wanted in Assassins Creed was a concise set of games, Four or five games, with a focused story the ultimately led to a modern day game where Desmond Miles topples the templars.
But no.
Now we have a platform for games rather then a cohesive set of narratives.
It felt like the first two games were part of a main narrative that was building towards that modern-day showdown. Brotherhood and Revelations were sort of interludes, and game 4 or 5 probably should have been the last mostly-historical one, followed by one final game in which the historical aspect is secondary to the modern day conclusion to the final plot. But instead of building a cohesive overarching story, they just found a way to turn AC into a historical version of Call of Duty or FIFA, churning out the same shit over and over again with just enough new paint to keep people buying.
Absolutely, if they’d gone that way it would have been cool as well. But, given they didn’t, the modern day stuff is just jarring and immersion-breaking. For me, at least.
Hash tag different people like different things and that’s ok!
I will say, I do wish the modern day plot focused on the differing philosophies of the Templars and the Assassins, rather than going as deep as it has into the wacky nonsense of the Juno/Jupiter mystical plotline.
Hash tag different people like different things and that’s ok!
I mostly agree with this. Except that hash tag. Your use of "hash tag" here is an abomination.
I mostly agree with this. Except that hash tag. Your use of “hash tag” here is an abomination.
I know dot jay peg!
ಠ_ಠ
Couldn't agree more. I got literal goose bumps at the end of AC1, felt like I was progressing towards some sort of ultimate showdown in 2 and its spinoffs. And then their lust for a never ending cash cow straight up ruined it.
Never played 3, but played Black Flag up until they started talking about aliens (I think?) and then noped out. Not touched the franchise since.
Yes, I felt very similar, loved the first two and always understood it was supposed to be a trilogy, but when they diverted to Revelations I saw it was going to be drawn out and I totally lost interest.
I've played a tiny bit of Black Flag and Unity but they never grabbed my interest like the first two and it's story arc
Dude, AC3 is the culmination of the modern-day plot you are looking for. It is still historic-focused, but has Desmond go on modern-day missions periodically. Desmond’s death is a sacrifice related to the plot about aliens.
AC Black Flag is the first game where they ditched the modern game plot in favor of focusing on the historic plot.
Yeah but having some modern-day stuff isn't what I wanted. Even Brotherhood had that. What I wanted to see was a final ultimate showdown between the Templar and Assassins.