Lauren Boebert is laughed at on the House floor as she’s fact-checked by EPA head

When are people going to understand it’s not about being right. She is teeing up soundbites for right wing media to clip and talk about “how brave she is for tackling the corrupt EPA.”

We are just enjoying stupidity being laughed at publicly instead of having to hide it for 'decorum'. The reason she is being stupid is not relevant.
We all know.
- Apparently this article doesn’t
So lmk when you plan to stand against Biden, he literally has crossed all his morals so clearly has none left, and/or how do you plan to defend him?
- I would like you to tell me how to “stand against Biden.”
- /LostLemmings
- Well nobody was even talking about him for starters, and most successful president in the last 20 years?

She won against the last Democrat by less percentage than my current BAC in a solid red district. Her being the candidate is the best hope for Dems to take that seat.
- She's not campaigning for a seat in the same district. She moved to a district in Eastern Colorado because she knew she couldn't get elected in the same district she ran in last time.
- .17 - pretty good for a Thursday.
- Plot twist: your name is Bender Bending Rodriguez and your current BAC is 70.00
Republican voters neither have shame nor self respect. That’s why they keep voting for carpetbaggers like Bobert, Majorie, Chickenshit Hawley etc.
Is there nothing we can do to prevent her re-election?
- yes. it's really simple. somebody just needs to do it. make an example out of her.

By the end of the back-and-forth, Regan stared at Boebert shaking his head with his mouth a gap.
“It’s just shocking you spent so much time with our regional staff and regional administration and region aid and have such productive conversations about how we’re doing things for your district and your state and then you take this microphone and you pretend that we should not exist,” Regan said.

Oh it’s all a big show for the idiots? Of course. She’s so dumb she can’t even make up an imaginary question.

That's not the kind of head she good with

Hey, good thing our Supreme Court just ruled that people like her (and ultimately, them) will be the ones deciding ALL OF OUR REGULATIONS.

And stupid fucks like Boebert are actually desirable in that situation. Moreso than the more clever folks that will just get corporate lobbiests to literally write the regulations themselves for an $18k "donation" to their "campaign," and a promise of a job after they're voted out in two years or whatever.

If Congress does not codify Chevron deference before Trump (or any other conservative) takes office, then kiss "the administrative state" goodbye. And if you think you're ok with that, or have some clever retort about "bureaucracy bad," then you're gonna find out real quick...

$18k “donation”
This is the part I hate the most about this. It's one thing that we have this "squint a little and you'll see it" kind of graft and corruption. It's another entirely that the going rate for sending us all down the river is appallingly low. Especially since the kind of money a corporation can make for a favorable legal change could be a thousand times that, or more.
- The reason corporations buy politicians is because they're cheap.
- Don't be so pessimistic! It really adds up if you do it enough!
  Plus, the cushy job after leaving office is the real prize. Why don't you just go ask John Boehner? Motherfucker spent a several decade career demonizing cannabis, blocking its decriminalization and putting hundreds of thousands of people in prison for it. He was the ~~third~~ second(? do you count the president?) person in line of presidential succession for at least a decade (think about that). Now he works at a pro-cannabis legalization lobby group (at least as of the last time I looked. Not going to google that piece of shit right now).
  Republicans have no morals or ethics. They have no values to stand by.
  The fact that they concede that they can't stop themselves from raping and murdering folks without some kind of threat of cosmic torture is a pretty big self-report.

"Elected idiot doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground" could be a permanent headline these days.

Did she change something? Is it the hair? She seems way more plastic and somewhat more doglike than usual.

I get her and the other one mixed up. Is she the bleach blonde bitch body or the Beetlejuice handy?
- Y'all are lazy. Attack them for their idiotic choices and malice.
- These are lazy, misogynistic takes.

What a dumb

___

C U Next Tuesday

Who wrote that article? The amount of typos and misspellings is insane.

I’m not a fan or sympathiser for Boebert but nothing in the way the article is written seems to imply impartial journalism. We are so fucked.

Independent is a terrible outlet. I don't know why it gets linked so much on social media. Maybe because they have the most click bait titles or something.
The world would probably look a lot different if we'd stop riling each other up all the time. Media outlets like that feed on the hate and only promote it.
- Independent is a terrible outlet.
  That’s why Trent Crimm left.
- I would argue that you couldn't really get much less clickbait-y than the headline here. The only detail it leaves out is what the actual fact that was checked is, and that's because that explanation wouldn't fit in a title.
I like to think "rouge bureaucrats" is another name for conservative bureaucrats.

You know what makes me feel like a shitty person? Grinning when a piece of shit like Boebert gets embarrassed like this, but then realizing she probably has a serious mental deficiency. Still, she deserves all of this and more.

Probably? Her mama dropped her in the revolving door on the way out the hospital when she was born and then waited for a marching band to go through that mother fucker before scooping her up. There are people with mental deficiencies that arent full of hate and destruction. Don't ever feel shitty when truth and reason finally gets a small victory.
She's not embarrassed by this, you've gotta have more than 2 brain cells to rub together to feel embarrassed.

Ooof the dreaded fact check

She heard "head" and got excited.

Well yeah anyone can be politicians these days

I wonder if she’s taking Russian lessons yet

She’s learned all she’ll need
- Hawk Tuah?

She just kept thinking about that BBC lmao

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Michael Regan, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, gave Boebert a befuddled look when she asked him if the federal agency would continue enabling “rouge bureaucrats to enact unconstitutional regulations” even after the court’s decision that ended the 40-year run of the so-called Chevron standard.

Boebert fired back the same question and dug her heels in the sand, asking him which regulations the EPA would “repeal” to adhere to the court’s ruling.

However, the ruling does not prevent agencies from continuing to issue regulations – something Boebert’s question seemed to imply.

Regan testified to the House Oversight and Accountability Committee on Wednesday about the Supreme Court’s recent decision, saying he was “disappointed” and concerned about its impact.

He told committee members that the decision could hurt the EPA’s ability to interpret language and implement regulations about climate-related investments – something the Joe Biden administration has prioritized over the last four years.

Shortly after Boebert and Regan’s exchange, New York Representative Daniel Goldman pointedly spelled out the Supreme Court’s hearing for “clarify” purposes.

The original article contains 452 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!